• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Does an increase in the Medicaid reimbursement rate improve nursing home quality?

作者信息

Grabowski D C

机构信息

Department of Health Care Organization and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, USA.

出版信息

J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2001 Mar;56(2):S84-93. doi: 10.1093/geronb/56.2.s84.

DOI:10.1093/geronb/56.2.s84
PMID:11245368
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Numerous studies have documented poor nursing home quality over the last 3 decades. Previous research has questioned the effectiveness of Medicaid reimbursement policy in improving quality in the presence of certificate-of-need (CON) and construction moratoria regulation. This study evaluated how the Medicaid reimbursement rate may influence a home's decision to provide quality under CON and moratoria.

METHODS

Linking national data from the On-Line Survey, Certification, and Reporting system, the Area Resource File, and aggregate reimbursement information, the author examined the effect of Medicaid reimbursement on a range of quality measures in the context of CON and moratoria.

RESULTS

An increase in Medicaid reimbursement improved quality as measured by professional staffing, but there was not a statistically significant effect when quality was measured by nonprofessional staffing, various procedural measures, or regulatory deficiencies. However, this study did not support previous research showing a negative effect of Medicaid reimbursement on nursing home quality in the context of CON laws.

DISCUSSION

This study supports recent trends suggesting that nursing home CON laws may be lessening in importance for the nursing home market. Nevertheless, further work is necessary to determine the quality returns to increased Medicaid reimbursement.

摘要

相似文献

1
Does an increase in the Medicaid reimbursement rate improve nursing home quality?
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2001 Mar;56(2):S84-93. doi: 10.1093/geronb/56.2.s84.
2
Medicaid reimbursement and the quality of nursing home care.医疗补助报销与疗养院护理质量。
J Health Econ. 2001 Jul;20(4):549-69. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(01)00083-2.
3
The relationship of Medicaid payment rates, bed constraint policies, and risk-adjusted pressure ulcers.医疗补助支付率、床位限制政策与风险调整后的压疮之间的关系。
Health Serv Res. 2004 Aug;39(4 Pt 1):793-812. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00258.x.
4
How Does Medicaid Reimbursement Impact Nursing Home Quality? The Effects of Small Anticipatory Changes.医疗补助报销如何影响养老院质量?小规模预期变化的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2017 Oct;52(5):1729-1748. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12553. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
5
Nursing home performance under case-mix reimbursement: responding to heavy-care incentives and market changes.按病例组合报销制度下的养老院绩效:应对重症护理激励措施和市场变化。
Health Serv Res. 1998 Oct;33(4 Pt 1):815-34.
6
The effect of Medicaid nursing home reimbursement policy on Medicare hospice use in nursing homes.医疗补助养老院报销政策对养老院中使用医疗保险临终关怀服务的影响。
Med Care. 2011 Sep;49(9):797-802. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318223c0ae.
7
The economic implications of case-mix Medicaid reimbursement for nursing home care.医疗补助按病例组合对疗养院护理进行报销的经济影响。
Inquiry. 2002 Fall;39(3):258-78. doi: 10.5034/inquiryjrnl_39.3.258.
8
A longitudinal study of Medicaid payment, private-pay price and nursing home quality.一项关于医疗补助支付、自费价格与养老院质量的纵向研究。
Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2004 Mar;4(1):5-26. doi: 10.1023/b:ihfe.0000019258.29496.03.
9
The effect of Medicaid reimbursement on quality of care in nursing homes.医疗补助报销对疗养院护理质量的影响。
J Health Econ. 1996 Feb;15(1):23-48. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(95)00030-5.
10
Medicaid capital reimbursement policy and environmental artifacts of nursing home culture change.医疗补助资本报销政策与养老院文化变革的环境人工制品。
Gerontologist. 2014 Feb;54 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S76-86. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnt141.

引用本文的文献

1
Certificate-Of-Need Regulation and Healthcare Service Quality: Evidence from the Nursing Home Industry.需求证明监管与医疗服务质量:来自养老院行业的证据
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Oct 23;8(4):423. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8040423.
2
The effect of political control on financial performance, structure, and outcomes of US nursing homes.政治控制对美国养老院的财务绩效、结构和结果的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2019 Feb;54(1):167-180. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13061. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
3
The relationship between nursing home quality and costs: Evidence from the VA.
养老院质量与成本之间的关系:来自 VA 的证据。
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 19;13(9):e0203764. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203764. eCollection 2018.
4
Constructing a Measure of Private-pay Nursing Home Days.构建私人付费养老院日数的衡量标准。
Med Care. 2018 May;56(5):e26-e31. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000749.
5
How Does Medicaid Reimbursement Impact Nursing Home Quality? The Effects of Small Anticipatory Changes.医疗补助报销如何影响养老院质量?小规模预期变化的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2017 Oct;52(5):1729-1748. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12553. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
6
The Impact of Certificate-of-Need Laws on Nursing Home and Home Health Care Expenditures.需求证明法对疗养院和家庭医疗保健支出的影响。
Med Care Res Rev. 2016 Feb;73(1):85-105. doi: 10.1177/1077558715597161. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
7
Staffing subsidies and the quality of care in nursing homes.养老院的人员配置补贴与护理质量。
J Health Econ. 2015 May;41:133-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2015.02.002. Epub 2015 Feb 19.
8
Higher Medicare SNF care utilization by dual-eligible beneficiaries: can Medicaid long-term care policies be the answer?双重资格受益人的医疗保险 SNF 护理利用率较高:医疗补助长期护理政策能否成为答案?
Health Serv Res. 2015 Feb;50(1):161-79. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12204. Epub 2014 Jul 22.
9
Resident- and Facility-Level Predictors of Quality of Life in Long-Term Care.长期护理中居民和机构层面生活质量的预测因素
Gerontologist. 2015 Aug;55(4):643-55. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnt148. Epub 2013 Dec 17.
10
The association between health care quality and cost: a systematic review.医疗保健质量与成本的关联:系统评价。
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Jan 1;158(1):27-34. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-1-201301010-00006.