Blanchet S, Desgranges B, Denise P, Lechevalier B, Eustache F, Faure S
Laboratoire de Psychologie Cognitive et Pathologique and Pôle Modélisation en Sciences Cognitives, Maison de la Recherche en Sciences Humaines, Université de Caen, 14032 Cedex, Caen, France.
Neuropsychologia. 2001;39(5):502-9. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(00)00119-6.
According to the hemispheric encoding/retrieval asymmetry (HERA) model, based on data obtained through functional neuroimaging, the left and right prefrontal cortices are preferentially, and, respectively, involved in long-term episodic memory encoding and retrieval. In this study, the HERA model was tested from a behavioral perspective using divided visual-field tachistoscopy. A recognition paradigm with both verbal and visuospatial materials was devised to differentiate memory-related effects (encoding vs. retrieval) from effects linked to the materials. The paradigm used lists of 12 and four items to assess long-term episodic memory and short-term memory, respectively. The aim of the latter condition was to test whether the HERA model is applicable in short-term memory. For long-term episodic memory, the data obtained validated the HERA model; the direction of the hemispheric asymmetry was found to depend on the type of materials used, whereas its magnitude was determined by the type of memory process. For verbal short-term memory, the HERA model seems to be confirmed. The pre-existing representations of the material could take into account the similarity of the hemispheric asymmetry pattern between short-term memory and long-term memory. In contrast, for visuospatial short-term memory, Baddeley's working memory model seems to better explain our results insofar as the asymmetries were essentially linked to the material in encoding but not in retrieval. This latter difference between short-term memory and long-term indicates that processes involved in LTM depend on episodic processes per se, hence, lending more support for the HERA model. Accordingly, these two memory systems seem to bring into play two different modes of hemisphere specialization.
根据半球编码/提取不对称(HERA)模型,基于通过功能神经成像获得的数据,左前额叶皮质和右前额叶皮质分别优先参与长期情景记忆的编码和提取。在本研究中,使用分视野速示器从行为学角度对HERA模型进行了测试。设计了一种包含言语和视觉空间材料的识别范式,以区分与记忆相关的效应(编码与提取)和与材料相关的效应。该范式分别使用12项和4项列表来评估长期情景记忆和短期记忆。后一种情况的目的是测试HERA模型是否适用于短期记忆。对于长期情景记忆,获得的数据验证了HERA模型;发现半球不对称的方向取决于所用材料的类型,而其程度则由记忆过程的类型决定。对于言语短期记忆,HERA模型似乎得到了证实。材料的预先存在的表征可以考虑短期记忆和长期记忆之间半球不对称模式的相似性。相比之下,对于视觉空间短期记忆,就不对称性主要与编码中的材料相关而非提取中的材料相关而言,Baddeley的工作记忆模型似乎能更好地解释我们的结果。短期记忆和长期记忆之间的后一种差异表明,长期记忆中涉及的过程本身取决于情景过程,因此,为HERA模型提供了更多支持。因此,这两种记忆系统似乎发挥了两种不同的半球特化模式。