Chiloeches A, Mason C S, Marais R
CRC Centre for Cell and Molecular Biology, Institute of Cancer Research, London SW3 6JB, United Kingdom.
Mol Cell Biol. 2001 Apr;21(7):2423-34. doi: 10.1128/MCB.21.7.2423-2434.2001.
The Raf-1 serine/threonine protein kinase requires phosphorylation of the serine at position 338 (S338) for activation. Ras is required to recruit Raf-1 to the plasma membrane, which is where S338 phosphorylation occurs. The recent suggestion that Pak3 could stimulate Raf-1 activity by directly phosphorylating S338 through a Ras/phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (Pl3-K)/-Cdc42-dependent pathway has attracted much attention. Using a phospho-specific antibody to S338, we have reexamined this model. Using LY294002 and wortmannin, inhibitors of Pl3-K, we find that growth factor-mediated S338 phosphorylation still occurs, even when Pl3-K activity is completely blocked. Although high concentrations of LY294002 and wortmannin did suppress S338 phosphorylation, they also suppressed Ras activation. Additionally, we show that Pak3 is not activated under conditions where S338 is phosphorylated, but when Pak3 is strongly activated, by coexpression with V12Cdc42 or by mutations that make it independent of Cdc42, it did stimulate S338 phosphorylation. However, this occurred in the cytosol and did not stimulate Raf-1 kinase activity. The inability of Pak3 to activate Raf-1 was not due to an inability to stimulate phosphorylation of the tyrosine at position 341 but may be due to its inability to recruit Raf-1 to the plasma membrane. Taken together, our data show that growth factor-stimulated Raf-1 activity is independent of Pl3-K activity and argue against Pak3 being a physiological mediator of S338 phosphorylation in growth factor-stimulated cells.
Raf-1丝氨酸/苏氨酸蛋白激酶需要338位丝氨酸(S338)磷酸化才能激活。Ras需要将Raf-1招募到质膜,而S338磷酸化正是在此发生。最近有观点认为,Pak3可通过Ras/磷脂酰肌醇3激酶(Pl3-K)/ -Cdc42依赖性途径直接磷酸化S338来刺激Raf-1活性,这一观点备受关注。我们使用针对S338的磷酸化特异性抗体重新审视了该模型。使用Pl3-K抑制剂LY294002和渥曼青霉素,我们发现即使Pl3-K活性完全被阻断,生长因子介导的S338磷酸化仍会发生。尽管高浓度的LY294002和渥曼青霉素确实抑制了S338磷酸化,但它们也抑制了Ras激活。此外,我们发现当S338磷酸化时,Pak3未被激活,但当Pak3通过与V12Cdc42共表达或通过使其独立于Cdc42的突变而被强烈激活时,它确实刺激了S338磷酸化。然而,这发生在细胞质中,并未刺激Raf-1激酶活性。Pak3无法激活Raf-1并非由于无法刺激341位酪氨酸的磷酸化,而是可能由于其无法将Raf-1招募到质膜。综上所述,我们的数据表明生长因子刺激的Raf-1活性独立于Pl3-K活性,并且反对Pak3作为生长因子刺激细胞中S338磷酸化的生理介质。