Junkins E P, Furnival R A, Bolte R G
Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City 84113, USA.
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2001 Feb;17(1):15-8. doi: 10.1097/00006565-200102000-00004.
Few studies have addressed the presentation and clinical impact of pediatric pelvic fractures. We sought to describe pediatric blunt trauma patients with pelvic fracture (PF) and to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of physical examination at presentation for diagnosis.
Retrospective analysis of all PF and control (NPF) patients from our pediatric institution over an 8-year period.
A total of 174 patients (88 PF, 86 NPF) were included. Median patient age was 8 years (range, 3 months to 18 years), with 54% males. The most common mechanisms of injury for PF patients were automobile-related accidents (75%). There were 140 patients (87%) who were transported by air or ground medical services. At presentation, approximately 16% of PF patients had a Glasgow Coma score of <15, a mean Revised Trauma Score of 7.49, and a median Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 9. Thirty-one PF patients (35%) had an ISS of >15 indicating severe, multiple injuries. Sixty-eight PF patients (77%) had severe isolated injuries (Abbreviated Injury Scale 1990 value of >3); 11% of PF patients required transfusions, and 2% died. Fifteen PF patients (17% ) had no pelvic ring disruption; 39 (43%) had a single pelvic ring fracture, 22 (2%) had two pelvic ring fractures, 2 (2%) had acetabular fractures, and 10 (11%) had a combination of pelvic fractures. An abnormal physical examination of the pelvis was noted in 81 patients with PF (92% sensitivity, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.89-0.95), 15 NPF patients had an abnormal examination (79% specificity, 95% CI = 0.74-0.84). The positive predictive value of the pelvis examination was 0.84, and the negative predictive value was 0.89. The most common abnormal pelvis examination finding was pelvic tenderness in 65 PF patients (73%). A total of seven PF patients had a normal examination of the pelvis; four had a depressed level of consciousness (defined as GCS <15), and six patients had a distracting injury.
Pediatric blunt trauma patients with pelvic fracture represent a severely injured population but generally have lower transfusion rates and mortality than noted in adult studies. The pelvis examination appears to be sensitive and specific in this retrospective study. However, an altered level of consciousness and/or distracting injuries may affect examination sensitivity and specificity. Based on this retrospective study, we cannot advocate eliminating pelvic radiographs in the severely injured, blunt trauma patient. Prospective studies are recommended.
很少有研究探讨小儿骨盆骨折的表现及临床影响。我们试图描述患有骨盆骨折(PF)的小儿钝性创伤患者,并评估就诊时体格检查对诊断的敏感性和特异性。
对我们儿科机构8年间所有PF和对照(非PF)患者进行回顾性分析。
共纳入174例患者(88例PF,86例非PF)。患者中位年龄为8岁(范围3个月至18岁),男性占54%。PF患者最常见的受伤机制是与汽车相关的事故(75%)。有140例患者(87%)通过空中或地面医疗服务转运。就诊时,约16%的PF患者格拉斯哥昏迷评分为<15,平均修订创伤评分为7.49,中位损伤严重度评分(ISS)为9。31例PF患者(35%)的ISS>15,表明有严重的多发伤。68例PF患者(77%)有严重的孤立伤(1990年简略损伤量表值>3);11%的PF患者需要输血,2%死亡。15例PF患者(17%)没有骨盆环破坏;39例(43%)有单一骨盆环骨折,22例(2%)有两处骨盆环骨折,2例(2%)有髋臼骨折,10例(11%)有骨盆骨折合并伤。81例PF患者骨盆体格检查异常(敏感性92%,95%置信区间[CI]=0.89 - 0.95),15例非PF患者检查异常(特异性79%,95%CI = 0.74 - 0.84)。骨盆检查的阳性预测值为0.84,阴性预测值为0.89。最常见的骨盆检查异常发现是65例PF患者(73%)有骨盆压痛。共有7例PF患者骨盆检查正常;4例意识水平降低(定义为格拉斯哥昏迷评分<15),6例有分散注意力的损伤。
患有骨盆骨折的小儿钝性创伤患者是严重受伤人群,但与成人研究相比,输血率和死亡率通常较低。在这项回顾性研究中,骨盆检查似乎具有敏感性和特异性。然而,意识水平改变和/或分散注意力的损伤可能会影响检查的敏感性和特异性。基于这项回顾性研究,我们不主张在严重受伤的钝性创伤患者中取消骨盆X线检查。建议进行前瞻性研究。