Suppr超能文献

单硝酸异山梨酯、米索前列醇及联合疗法用于孕早期术前宫颈成熟的比较:一项随机对照试验

A comparison of isosorbide mononitrate, misoprostol and combination therapy for first trimester pre-operative cervical ripening: a randomised controlled trial.

作者信息

Ledingham M A, Thomson A J, Lunan C B, Greer I A, Norman J E

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, UK.

出版信息

BJOG. 2001 Mar;108(3):276-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2001.00041.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether a combined therapy with isosorbide mononitrate (40mg) and misoprostol (400 microg) for pre-operative cervical ripening in the first trimester would result in improved clinical effectiveness, and fewer side effects compared with each agent used alone.

DESIGN

Randomised controlled trial.

SETTING

Glasgow Royal Infirmary.

POPULATION

Sixty-six primigravid women scheduled for suction termination of pregnancy.

METHODS

Women were randomly assigned to receive before surgery, per vaginam, isosorbide mononitrate 40 mg (n = 22), misoprostol 400 microg (n = 22) or both agents together [isosorbide mononitrate 40 mg and misoprostol 400 microg] (n = 22).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

  1. To assess the cumulative force required to dilate the cervix to 8 mm; 2. the onset of new symptoms before termination of pregnancy.

RESULTS

The cervical resistance following combination therapy with isosorbide mononitrate and misoprostol was not significantly different than following misoprostol alone [24.5N vs 18.5N; median difference (95% CI) 19N (-22 to 49)]. Pre-treatment with misoprostol used alone resulted in a lower cervical resistance than isosorbide mononitrate alone (18.5N vs 39N, P = 0.04, Mann-Whitney U test). There was no difference in the number of women remaining asymptomatic following either isosorbide mononitrate or misoprostol or combination therapy [14/22 (64%) vs 11/21 (52%) vs 11/22 (50%), Fisher's exact test].

CONCLUSIONS

We have not shown any advantage of combining misoprostol with the nitric oxide donor isosorbide mononitrate compared with misoprostol alone for pre-operative cervical ripening in the first trimester.

摘要

目的

确定在孕早期术前使用单硝酸异山梨酯(40mg)和米索前列醇(400μg)联合治疗进行宫颈成熟是否会比单独使用每种药物产生更高的临床疗效和更少的副作用。

设计

随机对照试验。

地点

格拉斯哥皇家医院。

研究对象

66名单胎初孕妇计划行人工流产术。

方法

将女性随机分配,在手术前经阴道给予单硝酸异山梨酯40mg(n = 22)、米索前列醇400μg(n = 22)或两种药物联合使用[单硝酸异山梨酯40mg和米索前列醇400μg](n = 22)。

主要观察指标

  1. 评估将宫颈扩张至8mm所需的累积力量;2. 终止妊娠前新症状的出现情况。

结果

单硝酸异山梨酯和米索前列醇联合治疗后的宫颈阻力与单独使用米索前列醇相比无显著差异[24.5N对18.5N;中位数差异(95%CI)19N(-22至49)]。单独使用米索前列醇预处理导致的宫颈阻力低于单独使用单硝酸异山梨酯(18.5N对39N,P = 0.04,曼-惠特尼U检验)。在接受单硝酸异山梨酯或米索前列醇或联合治疗后仍无症状的女性数量上无差异[14/22(64%)对11/21(52%)对11/22(50%),费舍尔精确检验]。

结论

对于孕早期术前宫颈成熟,我们未发现与单独使用米索前列醇相比,米索前列醇与一氧化氮供体单硝酸异山梨酯联合使用有任何优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验