Chen G, Zhou D, Kang B C
Jack Bell Research Center, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Respir Physiol. 2001 Apr;125(3):239-47. doi: 10.1016/s0034-5687(00)00222-x.
The role of allergens in asthmatic inflammation is not clearly understood. To elucidate the mechanism of cockroach allergen (CRa)-induced airway disease, we studied three groups of Hartley guinea-pigs sensitized to control, ovalbumin (OA) or CRa. Parameters measured were anaphylactic antibodies by allergy skin test (AST), PCA assay and Western blot, changes in specific airway resistance (SRaw), analysis of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and contracture responses of tracheal muscle (TSM) to non-specific and specific stimuli, in vitro. Both OA and CRa animals showed a similar allergic sensitization (AST and PCA), while Western blot identified several reaginic bands in CRa group compared to a single band in OA group. SRaw illustrated that CRa induce dual-asthmatic responses (4/6) in the CRa group, whereas OA induce only an early asthmatic response (3/6) in the OA group (P<0.01). The average total leukocytes in BALF of the CRa were 27.0x10(6), mostly neutrophils and eosinophils, while those of the OA showed 3.5x10(6), mostly eosinophils, respectively (P<0.0001). TSM responses to non-specific stimuli were similar in both groups (P>0.1), while the antigen-specific TSM contractions were more brisk in the OA group than those of CRa group (P<0.001). Thus, the study indicates that both CRa and OA sensitize guinea-pigs, yet CRa induces more severe and persistent late-phase inflammation than OA. This appears to be related to an influx of neutrophils rather than anaphylactic bronchospasm.
变应原在哮喘炎症中的作用尚未完全明确。为阐明蟑螂变应原(CRa)诱发气道疾病的机制,我们研究了三组对对照物、卵清蛋白(OA)或CRa致敏的Hartley豚鼠。所测参数包括通过变应原皮肤试验(AST)、被动皮肤过敏试验(PCA)和蛋白质印迹法检测的过敏抗体,特异性气道阻力(SRaw)的变化,支气管肺泡灌洗(BAL)分析以及气管肌肉(TSM)对非特异性和特异性刺激的挛缩反应(体外)。OA组和CRa组动物均表现出相似的过敏致敏反应(AST和PCA),而蛋白质印迹法显示CRa组有几条反应素条带,相比之下OA组只有一条。SRaw表明CRa组中CRa诱发双相哮喘反应(4/6),而OA组中OA仅诱发早期哮喘反应(3/6)(P<0.01)。CRa组支气管肺泡灌洗液(BALF)中的平均总白细胞数为27.0×10⁶,主要是中性粒细胞和嗜酸性粒细胞,而OA组为3.5×10⁶,主要是嗜酸性粒细胞(P<0.0001)。两组对非特异性刺激的TSM反应相似(P>0.1),而OA组中抗原特异性TSM收缩比CRa组更明显(P<0.001)。因此,该研究表明CRa和OA均可使豚鼠致敏,但CRa比OA诱发更严重和持久的迟发性炎症。这似乎与中性粒细胞的流入而非过敏性支气管痉挛有关。