Dulkys Y, Schramm G, Kimmig D, Knöss S, Weyergraf A, Kapp A, Elsner J
Hannover Medical University, Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Hannover, Germany.
J Invest Dermatol. 2001 Apr;116(4):498-505. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1747.2001.01299.x.
As many new biologically active chemokines have been cloned exploring the genomic DNA sequence database in the vicinity of already known chemokine sequences without demonstrating their natural origin, it is important to transfer findings from in vitro experiments with chemokines into the in vivo situation. With respect to eosinophils and fibroblasts that play an important part in the pathogenesis of allergic and autoimmune diseases, the role of the recently discovered members of the eotaxin family, eotaxin-2 and eotaxin-3, is not really understood. In order to elucidate the origin and biologic potency of the eotaxin family this study was performed. Conventional reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction analysis was suitable to detect mRNA for eotaxin and eotaxin-3 but not for eotaxin-2 in dermal fibroblasts. In contrast to conventional reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, LightCycler analysis revealed that dermal fibroblasts constitutively expressed mRNA not only for eotaxin and eotaxin-3 but also for eotaxin-2. Moreover, with this technique we investigated mRNA expression levels after stimulation of fibroblasts with interleukin-4 and interleukin-4 plus tumor necrosis factor-alpha: the rank order of expression levels within the eotaxin family was eotaxin > eotaxin-3 > eotaxin-2. To address the question of the efficacy of eotaxin-3, we compared its activity with eotaxin, eotaxin-2, monocyte chemotactic protein-3, monocyte chemotactic protein-4, and RANTES in different test systems for eosinophils. The efficacy of the CC chemokines at equimolar concentrations with respect to the chemotactic response of human eosinophils was eotaxin-3 = eotaxin = eotaxin-2 > RANTES > monocyte chemotactic protein-4. The rank order of activity with respect to actin polymerization and release of toxic reactive oxygen species was eotaxin-3 = eotaxin = eotaxin-2 and eotaxin = eotaxin-2 > eotaxin-3 = monocyte chemotactic protein-3 = monocyte chemotactic protein-4 = RANTES, respectively. This study indicated a distinct profile in expression levels of the members of the eotaxin family in dermal fibroblasts. Indeed, all three eotaxin ligands demonstrated activation of human eosinophils with similar efficacies for chemotaxis, cytoskeletal rearrangements, activation of Gi proteins and transients of [Ca2+]i, but a distinct profile of activity with respect to the binding to CCR3 and the release of toxic reactive oxygen species. These findings may help to understand further the role of CC chemokines in fibroblast/eosinophil activation, which is of interest particularly in allergic and autoimmune diseases.
由于许多新的具有生物活性的趋化因子是通过在已知趋化因子序列附近探索基因组DNA序列数据库克隆得到的,却未证明其天然来源,因此将趋化因子的体外实验结果转化到体内情况很重要。对于在过敏性和自身免疫性疾病发病机制中起重要作用的嗜酸性粒细胞和成纤维细胞,最近发现的嗜酸性粒细胞趋化因子家族成员嗜酸性粒细胞趋化因子-2和嗜酸性粒细胞趋化因子-3的作用尚未完全明确。为了阐明嗜酸性粒细胞趋化因子家族的来源和生物学活性,进行了本研究。传统的逆转录-聚合酶链反应分析适用于检测真皮成纤维细胞中嗜酸性粒细胞趋化因子和嗜酸性粒细胞趋化因子-3的mRNA,但不适用于嗜酸性粒细胞趋化因子-2。与传统的逆转录-聚合酶链反应不同,LightCycler分析显示真皮成纤维细胞组成性表达的mRNA不仅针对嗜酸性粒细胞趋化因子和嗜酸性粒细胞趋化因子-3,还针对嗜酸性粒细胞趋化因子-2。此外,我们用该技术研究了白细胞介素-4和白细胞介素-4加肿瘤坏死因子-α刺激成纤维细胞后的mRNA表达水平:嗜酸性粒细胞趋化因子家族内的表达水平排序为嗜酸性粒细胞趋化因子>嗜酸性粒细胞趋化因子-3>嗜酸性粒细胞趋化因子-2。为了解决嗜酸性粒细胞趋化因子-3的功效问题,我们在不同的嗜酸性粒细胞测试系统中比较了它与嗜酸性粒细胞趋化因子、嗜酸性粒细胞趋化因子-2、单核细胞趋化蛋白-3、单核细胞趋化蛋白-4和RANTES的活性。等摩尔浓度的CC趋化因子对人嗜酸性粒细胞趋化反应的功效为嗜酸性粒细胞趋化因子-3 = 嗜酸性粒细胞趋化因子 = 嗜酸性粒细胞趋化因子-2 > RANTES > 单核细胞趋化蛋白-4。关于肌动蛋白聚合和有毒活性氧释放的活性排序分别为嗜酸性粒细胞趋化因子-3 = 嗜酸性粒细胞趋化因子 = 嗜酸性粒细胞趋化因子-2以及嗜酸性粒细胞趋化因子 = 嗜酸性粒细胞趋化因子-2 > 嗜酸性粒细胞趋化因子-3 = 单核细胞趋化蛋白-3 = 单核细胞趋化蛋白-4 = RANTES。本研究表明真皮成纤维细胞中嗜酸性粒细胞趋化因子家族成员的表达水平具有明显特征。实际上,所有三种嗜酸性粒细胞趋化因子配体对人嗜酸性粒细胞的趋化、细胞骨架重排、Gi蛋白激活和[Ca2+]i瞬变都具有相似的激活功效,但在与CCR3结合和有毒活性氧释放方面具有不同的活性特征。这些发现可能有助于进一步理解CC趋化因子在成纤维细胞/嗜酸性粒细胞激活中的作用,这在过敏性和自身免疫性疾病中尤为重要。