Prinzmetal W, Shimamura A P, Mikolinski M
Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley 94720-1650, USA.
Percept Psychophys. 2001 Jan;63(1):99-114. doi: 10.3758/bf03200506.
A new theory, called the tilt constancy theory, claims that the Ponzo illusion is caused by the misperception of orientation induced by local visual cues. The theory relates the Ponzo illusion-along with the Zöllner, Poggendorff, Wündt-Hering, and cafe wall illusions-to the mechanisms that enable us to perceive stable orientations despite changes in retinal orientation or body orientation. In Experiment 1, the magnitude of the misperception of orientation was compared with the magnitude of the Ponzo illusion. In Experiment 2, predictions of the tilt constancy theory were compared with accounts based on (1) low spatial frequencies in the image, (2) memory comparisons (pool-and-store model), and (3) relative sizejudgments. In Experiment 3, predictions of the tilt constancy theory were tested against predictions of the assimilation theory of Pressey and his colleagues. In the final experiment, the orientation account was compared with theories based on linear perspective and inappropriate size constancy. The results support the tilt constancy theory.
一种名为倾斜恒常性理论的新理论声称,庞佐错觉是由局部视觉线索引起的方向误判所致。该理论将庞佐错觉——连同佐尔纳错觉、波根多夫错觉、温特-赫林错觉和咖啡馆墙壁错觉——与使我们能够在视网膜方向或身体方向发生变化的情况下仍能感知稳定方向的机制联系起来。在实验1中,将方向误判的程度与庞佐错觉的程度进行了比较。在实验2中,将倾斜恒常性理论的预测与基于以下内容的解释进行了比较:(1)图像中的低空间频率;(2)记忆比较(汇总存储模型);(3)相对大小判断。在实验3中,将倾斜恒常性理论的预测与普雷西及其同事的同化理论的预测进行了检验。在最后一个实验中,将方向解释与基于线性透视和不适当大小恒常性的理论进行了比较。结果支持倾斜恒常性理论。