Maskovsky J
Department of Anthropology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA.
Med Anthropol. 2000 Oct;19(2):121-46. doi: 10.1080/01459740.2000.9966173.
In order to explore the contradictions of neoliberal health policy, this article examines Medicaid managed care in Philadelphia. At the federal and state levels, government is increasingly promoting private-sector market-based strategies over policies formerly associated with the welfare state, arguing that the former are the most effective means of achieving economic growth and guaranteeing social welfare. A prime example of this shift, Medicaid managed care is a policy by which states contract with private-sector health maintenance organizations to provide health coverage to the poor. Drawing on ethnographic and historical data, this paper shows how Pennsylvania's Medicaid managed care program has created access barriers for poor Philadelphians. It also illustrates how ideologies that justify this policy shift serve to mask its detrimental effects on the poor. By contrasting the state's consumerist model with one group's protest efforts, this article calls into question the neoliberal ideology that undergirds health and welfare "reform."
为了探究新自由主义卫生政策的矛盾之处,本文考察了费城的医疗补助管理式医疗。在联邦和州层面,政府越来越多地推行基于私营部门市场的策略,而非以前与福利国家相关的政策,声称前者是实现经济增长和保障社会福利的最有效手段。这种转变的一个主要例子是医疗补助管理式医疗,这是一项各州与私营部门健康维护组织签约,为穷人提供医疗保险的政策。本文利用人种志和历史数据,展示了宾夕法尼亚州的医疗补助管理式医疗计划如何给费城的贫困人口造成了就医障碍。它还说明了为这一政策转变提供正当理由的意识形态是如何掩盖其对穷人的有害影响的。通过将该州的消费主义模式与一个群体的抗议努力进行对比,本文对支撑卫生与福利“改革”的新自由主义意识形态提出了质疑。