Maguire A, Murray J J, al-Majed I
Department of Child Dental Health, School of Dentistry, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Int J Paediatr Dent. 2000 Sep;10(3):182-90. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-263x.2000.00190.x.
To investigate treatment provision in primary and secondary dental care following complicated crown fracture of permanent teeth.
Retrospective observational survey of dental records of all patients attending a dental hospital trauma clinic during a 2-year period with complicated crown fracture.
Eighty children (70% male) aged 6-16 years (mean age 10.3 years) with 98 complicated crown fractures were identified. Of these children, 54% were seen for emergency treatment on the day of their injury, 75% within 48 h. Of the 98 injured teeth, 60% were seen initially in general dental practice but only 56% of these 59 cases were provided with emergency treatment in practice, the others being referred immediately to the trauma clinic for treatment. The main cause of fractures was transport, in particular, bicycles. Radiographs were available for 96 teeth; for the 43 open apex teeth, the definitive treatment was pulp capping (44% of cases) and pulpotomy (30%), with vitality maintained in five cases up to 4.8 years after trauma. The 53 closed apex cases were treated definitively with pulp capping (38%) and pulpectomy (36%) and six teeth had maintained their vitality up to 4.3 years after trauma. Sixty-seven per cent of the pulp caps and 47% of the 19 pulpotomies provided relied on a doubtful coronal seal. This was primarily due to the extensive use of a conventional glass ionomer cement as an emergency bandage. The use of an etched or bonded material at initial presentation extended the Median Survival Time for vitality in open apex teeth from 188 to 377 days and in closed apex teeth from 15 to 64 days.
Emergency treatment of complicated crown fractures, particularly in primary care services is often inappropriate or inadequate with regard to emergency management of the exposed pulp and provision of a hermetic coronal seal.
调查恒牙复杂冠折后在初级和二级牙科护理中的治疗情况。
对一家牙科医院创伤诊所2年内所有患有复杂冠折的患者的牙科记录进行回顾性观察调查。
确定了80名年龄在6至16岁(平均年龄10.3岁)的儿童(70%为男性),共98处复杂冠折。在这些儿童中,54%在受伤当天接受了急诊治疗,75%在48小时内接受治疗。在98颗受伤牙齿中,60%最初在普通牙科诊所就诊,但在这59例中只有56%在诊所接受了急诊治疗,其他则立即转诊至创伤诊所治疗。骨折的主要原因是交通,尤其是自行车。96颗牙齿有X光片;对于43颗根尖开放的牙齿,确定性治疗为盖髓术(44%的病例)和牙髓切断术(30%),5例在创伤后4.8年内保持了活力。53例根尖封闭的病例确定性治疗为盖髓术(38%)和牙髓摘除术(36%),6颗牙齿在创伤后4.3年内保持了活力。67%的盖髓术和47%的19例牙髓切断术所依赖的冠部封闭不可靠。这主要是由于广泛使用传统玻璃离子水门汀作为急诊绷带。在初次就诊时使用蚀刻或粘结材料将根尖开放牙齿活力的中位存活时间从188天延长至377天,根尖封闭牙齿从15天延长至64天。
复杂冠折的急诊治疗,尤其是在初级护理服务中,在暴露牙髓的急诊处理和提供密闭的冠部封闭方面往往不合适或不充分。