Suppr超能文献

颈动脉内膜剥脱术后复发性动脉狭窄行颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术的耐久性差:一项机构经验。

Poor durability of carotid angioplasty and stenting for treatment of recurrent artery stenosis after carotid endarterectomy: an institutional experience.

作者信息

Leger A R, Neale M, Harris J P

机构信息

Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, USA.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2001 May;33(5):1008-14. doi: 10.1067/mva.2001.113485.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Recurrent stenosis after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is often regarded as an optimal application of carotid artery angioplasty and stenting (CAS). The extended durability of CAS for recurrent carotid artery stenosis after CEA is unknown. We present the intermediate-term surveillance results for all eight CAS procedures performed over a 28-month period at a single tertiary referral center.

METHODS

Patients had recurrent carotid stenosis after CEA, whether symptomatic or asymptomatic, of 80% to 99% stenosis on preprocedural carotid duplex scan examination. Uncovered, self-expanding metal stents, in conjunction with angioplasty, were used in all patients. Baseline and scheduled interval follow-up duplex ultrasound scan was used to assess intrastent restenosis. Further angiography was reserved for those patients obtaining additional intervention.

RESULTS

One transient ischemic attack was observed 1 day after the procedure, and no cerebral infarcts occurred. All patients had angiographic resolution of the stenosis and postprocedural duplex scan studies without residual stenosis. Subsequent interval surveillance duplex scan examinations revealed significant (60%-79%) to critical (80%-99%) recurrent stenosis in six (75%) of eight patients, two of whom went on to further interventions. Of those with intrastent restenosis, four (75%) progressed to critical (80%-99%) stenosis. Mean follow-up was 20.2 months (range, 12-37 months). The two lesions that have not yet shown restenosis are those with the shortest follow-up interval, each at 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

In contrast to the optimistic claims in other series, this limited series suggests that angioplasty with stenting for recurrent carotid artery occlusive disease after CEA, although relatively safe in the short term, has significant limitations in terms of durability of results.

摘要

目的

颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)后复发性狭窄常被视为颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术(CAS)的最佳应用。CAS用于CEA后复发性颈动脉狭窄的长期耐久性尚不清楚。我们展示了在一个单一的三级转诊中心28个月内进行的8例CAS手术的中期监测结果。

方法

患者在CEA后出现复发性颈动脉狭窄,无论有无症状,术前颈动脉双功超声扫描检查显示狭窄程度为80%至99%。所有患者均使用未覆盖的自膨式金属支架联合血管成形术。基线和定期的间隔随访双功超声扫描用于评估支架内再狭窄。对于那些需要额外干预的患者,保留进一步的血管造影检查。

结果

术后1天观察到1次短暂性脑缺血发作,未发生脑梗死。所有患者的狭窄在血管造影上均得到解决,术后双功超声扫描研究无残余狭窄。随后的间隔随访双功超声扫描检查显示,8例患者中有6例(75%)出现了严重(60%-79%)至临界(80%-99%)的复发性狭窄,其中2例继续接受进一步干预。在那些有支架内再狭窄的患者中,4例(75%)进展为临界(80%-99%)狭窄。平均随访时间为20.2个月(范围为12-37个月)。尚未显示再狭窄的两个病变是随访间隔最短的,均为12个月。

结论

与其他系列研究中的乐观说法相反,这个有限的系列研究表明,CEA后复发性颈动脉闭塞性疾病的血管成形术和支架置入术虽然在短期内相对安全,但在结果的耐久性方面有显著局限性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验