Ulmschneider M B, Sansom M S
Laboratory of Molecular Biophysics, Rex Richards Building, Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, OX1 3QU, Oxford, UK.
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2001 May 2;1512(1):1-14. doi: 10.1016/s0005-2736(01)00299-1.
Advances in structure determination of membrane proteins enable analysis of the propensities of amino acids in extramembrane versus transmembrane locations to be performed on the basis of structure rather than of sequence and predicted topology. Using 29 available structures of integral membrane proteins with resolutions better than 4 A the distributions of amino acids in the transmembrane domains were calculated. The results were compared to analysis based on just the sequences of the same transmembrane alpha-helices and significant differences were found. The distribution of residues between transmembrane alpha-helices and beta-strands was also compared. Large hydrophobic (Phe, Leu, Ile, Val) residues showed a clear preference for the protein surfaces facing the lipids for beta-barrels, but in alpha-helical proteins no such preference was seen, with these residues equally distributed between the interior and the surface of the protein. A notable exception to this was alanine, which showed a slight preference for the interior of alpha-helical membrane proteins. Aromatic residues were found to follow saddle-like distributions preferring to be located in the lipid/water interfaces. The resultant 'aromatic belts' were spaced more closely for beta-barrel than for alpha-helical membrane proteins. Charged residues could be shown to generally avoid surfaces facing the bilayer although they were found to occur frequently in the transmembrane region of beta-barrels. Indeed detailed comparison between alpha-helical and beta-barrel proteins showed many qualitative differences in residue distributions. This suggests that there may be subtle differences in the factors stabilising beta-barrels in bacterial outer membranes and alpha-helix bundles in all other membranes.
膜蛋白结构测定技术的进步使得基于结构而非序列和预测拓扑结构来分析膜外与跨膜位置氨基酸的倾向成为可能。利用29个分辨率优于4 Å的完整膜蛋白可用结构,计算了跨膜结构域中氨基酸的分布。将结果与仅基于相同跨膜α螺旋序列的分析进行比较,发现了显著差异。还比较了跨膜α螺旋和β链之间残基的分布。对于β桶状结构,大的疏水(苯丙氨酸、亮氨酸、异亮氨酸、缬氨酸)残基明显倾向于面向脂质的蛋白质表面,但在α螺旋蛋白中未观察到这种偏好,这些残基在蛋白质内部和表面均匀分布。对此的一个显著例外是丙氨酸,它对α螺旋膜蛋白的内部略有偏好。发现芳香族残基呈鞍状分布,更喜欢位于脂质/水界面。β桶状结构的“芳香带”间距比α螺旋膜蛋白更紧密。带电荷的残基通常被证明会避开面向双层的表面,尽管它们在β桶状结构的跨膜区域中频繁出现。实际上,α螺旋蛋白和β桶状蛋白之间的详细比较显示,残基分布存在许多定性差异。这表明,在稳定细菌外膜中的β桶状结构和所有其他膜中的α螺旋束的因素可能存在细微差异。