Camilleri L F, Bailly P, Legault B J, Miguel B, D'Agrosa-Boiteux M C, de Riberolles C M
Department of CardioVascular Surgery, Gabriel Montpied Hospital, Place Henri Dunant, BP 69, 63003 Clermont-Ferrand Cedex 1, France.
Cardiovasc Surg. 2001 Jun;9(3):272-80. doi: 10.1016/s0967-2109(00)00136-8.
We assessed the clinical results of two bileaflet mechanical valves: the St. Jude Medical (SJM) and the Sorin Bicarbon (Sorin Bicarbon) used either in single mitral valve replacement (MVR) or in double, aortic and mitral, valve replacement (DVR).
Between September 1990 and November 1995, 217 patients received either a St. Jude Medical (n=134) or a Sorin Bicarbon (n=86): 136 mitral valve replacement with 83 St. Jude Medical and 53 Sorin Bicarbon and 84 double valve replacement with 51 St. Jude Medical and 33 Sorin Bicarbon. There was no difference between both St. Jude Medical and Sorin Bicarbon cohorts in respect of mitral valve physiopathology, etiology of valve disease, associated lesions, echocardiographic and hemodynamic data. The only significant preoperative difference was the age of patients within the double valve replacement group and the size of implanted valves within the mitral valve replacement group. Follow-up was 100% complete with a mean of 39+/-18 months, ranging between 6 and 68 months. The total follow-up was 657 patient-years (pt-y): 396 pt-y in the mitral valve replacement group and 274 pt-y in the double valve replacement group.
Hospital mortality (St. Jude Medical: 2.2%; Sorin Bicarbon: 6.9%) and late mortality (St. Jude Medical: 8.4%; Sorin Bicarbon: 6.3%) were not significantly different. Ten deaths were considered valve-related (St. Jude Medical 6, Sorin Bicarbon 4). The estimated 4-yr overall survival, including hospital mortality, was for St. Jude Medical--mitral valve replacement: 89+/-4% and St. Jude Medical--double valve replacement: 93+/-4%, and for Sorin Bicarbon--mitral valve replacement: 87+/-5% and Sorin Bicarbon--double valve replacement: 91+/-5%. The linearized incidence (% per pt-y) of valve-related complications was 6.39 in the St. Jude Medical cohort and 9.2 in the Sorin Bicarbon cohort. The linearized incidence (% pt-y) of the prevalent complication, valve thromboembolism and bleeding, was for St. Jude Medical-mitral valve replacement: 3.41, St. Jude Medical--double valve replacement: 3.16 and for Sorin Bicarbon--mitral valve replacement: 2.17 and Sorin Bicarbon--double valve replacement: 3.67. The differences between each group of an estimated 4-yr freedom from combined thromboembolism and bleeding were not significant (St. Jude Medical--mitral valve replacement: 90+/-4%, St. Jude Medical--double valve replacement: 84+/-6%, and for Sorin Bicarbon--mitral valve replacement: 94+/-3% and Sorin Bicarbon--double valve replacement: 75+/-17%).
In this clinical non-randomized study, there was no evidence of any significant difference between St. Jude Medical and Sorin Bicarbon valves over a 4-yr follow-up.
我们评估了两种双叶机械瓣膜(圣犹达医疗公司(SJM)瓣膜和索林碳酸氢盐(Sorin Bicarbon)瓣膜)在单纯二尖瓣置换术(MVR)或主动脉瓣与二尖瓣双瓣膜置换术(DVR)中的临床效果。
在1990年9月至1995年11月期间,217例患者接受了圣犹达医疗公司瓣膜(n = 134)或索林碳酸氢盐瓣膜(n = 86):136例二尖瓣置换术,其中83例使用圣犹达医疗公司瓣膜,53例使用索林碳酸氢盐瓣膜;84例双瓣膜置换术,其中51例使用圣犹达医疗公司瓣膜,33例使用索林碳酸氢盐瓣膜。在二尖瓣生理病理学、瓣膜疾病病因、相关病变、超声心动图和血流动力学数据方面,圣犹达医疗公司瓣膜组和索林碳酸氢盐瓣膜组之间没有差异。术前唯一显著的差异是双瓣膜置换组患者的年龄以及二尖瓣置换组中植入瓣膜的尺寸。随访率为100%,平均随访时间为39±18个月,范围在6至68个月之间。总随访时间为657患者年(pt - y):二尖瓣置换组为396 pt - y,双瓣膜置换组为274 pt - y。
医院死亡率(圣犹达医疗公司瓣膜:2.2%;索林碳酸氢盐瓣膜:6.9%)和晚期死亡率(圣犹达医疗公司瓣膜:8.4%;索林碳酸氢盐瓣膜:6.3%)无显著差异。10例死亡被认为与瓣膜相关(圣犹达医疗公司瓣膜6例,索林碳酸氢盐瓣膜4例)。包括医院死亡率在内的估计4年总生存率,圣犹达医疗公司瓣膜 - 二尖瓣置换术为89±4%,圣犹达医疗公司瓣膜 - 双瓣膜置换术为93±4%;索林碳酸氢盐瓣膜 - 二尖瓣置换术为87±5%,索林碳酸氢盐瓣膜 - 双瓣膜置换术为91±5%。圣犹达医疗公司瓣膜组瓣膜相关并发症的线性化发生率(每患者年%)为6.39,索林碳酸氢盐瓣膜组为9.2。常见并发症(瓣膜血栓栓塞和出血)的线性化发生率(每患者年%),圣犹达医疗公司瓣膜 - 二尖瓣置换术为3.41,圣犹达医疗公司瓣膜 - 双瓣膜置换术为3.16;索林碳酸氢盐瓣膜 - 二尖瓣置换术为2.17,索林碳酸氢盐瓣膜 - 双瓣膜置换术为3.67。估计4年无血栓栓塞和出血联合事件的每组差异不显著(圣犹达医疗公司瓣膜 - 二尖瓣置换术:90±4%,圣犹达医疗公司瓣膜 - 双瓣膜置换术:84±6%;索林碳酸氢盐瓣膜 - 二尖瓣置换术:94±3%,索林碳酸氢盐瓣膜 - 双瓣膜置换术:75±17%)。
在这项临床非随机研究中,在4年的随访期内,没有证据表明圣犹达医疗公司瓣膜和索林碳酸氢盐瓣膜之间存在任何显著差异。