Dickfeld T, Ruf A, Pogatsa-Murray G, Müller I, Engelmann B, Taubitz W, Fischer J, Meier O, Gawaz M
Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar and Deutsches Herzzentrum, Technische Universität München, Lazarettstrasse 36, 80636, Munich, Germany.
Thromb Res. 2001 Jan 15;101(2):53-64. doi: 10.1016/s0049-3848(00)00385-6.
The blockade of platelet glycoprotein IIb-IIIa (GPIIb-IIIa) was recently introduced as a new antiplatelet strategy. At present, various GPIIb-IIIa inhibitors are available to treat patients with acute coronary syndrome or when undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions. The current study systematically evaluates the antiplatelet effects of GPIIb-IIIa inhibitors in clinical use. Using conformation-dependent monoclonal antibodies [ligand-induced binding sites (LIBS-1), PMI-1] and flow cytometry, we showed that the GPIIb-IIIa antagonists abciximab, integrelin, lamifiban, and tirofiban, but not EMD 122347 or YM 337, induced LIBS activity of platelet GPIIb-IIIa. The LIBS activity of GPIIb-IIIa antagonists correlates with a proaggregatory response of fixed platelets pretreated with GPIIb-IIIa antagonists (intrinsic activity). All tested GPIIb-IIIa antagonists completely inhibit concentration-dependent ADP (20 micromol/l)-induced aggregation. In contrast, substantial TRAP (25 micromol/l)-induced platelet aggregation still occurs even at high inhibitor concentrations of the tested GPIIb-IIIa antagonists. In addition, we show that GPIIb-IIIa antagonists are poor inhibitors of platelet release reaction (ATP and P-selectin secretion) especially when strong agonists such as TRAP are used to activate platelets. Inhibition of platelet procoagulant activity (thrombin generation) by GPIIb-IIIa antagonists is dependent on the type and concentration of antagonists and on the strength of stimulus (thrombin, tissue factor) used to induce platelet-dependent thrombin generation. The present data show that significant pharmacological differences exist between GPIIb-IIIa antagonists that may have consequences for antithrombotic strategies and for future drug development.
血小板糖蛋白IIb-IIIa(GPIIb-IIIa)阻断剂最近作为一种新的抗血小板策略被引入。目前,有多种GPIIb-IIIa抑制剂可用于治疗急性冠脉综合征患者或接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者。本研究系统评估了临床使用的GPIIb-IIIa抑制剂的抗血小板作用。使用构象依赖性单克隆抗体[配体诱导结合位点(LIBS-1)、PMI-1]和流式细胞术,我们发现GPIIb-IIIa拮抗剂阿昔单抗、依替巴肽、拉米非班和替罗非班可诱导血小板GPIIb-IIIa的LIBS活性,而EMD 122347或YM 337则不能。GPIIb-IIIa拮抗剂的LIBS活性与用GPIIb-IIIa拮抗剂预处理的固定血小板的促聚集反应(内在活性)相关。所有测试的GPIIb-IIIa拮抗剂均能完全抑制浓度依赖性ADP(20微摩尔/升)诱导的聚集。相比之下,即使在测试的GPIIb-IIIa拮抗剂的高抑制剂浓度下,大量凝血酶受体激活肽(TRAP,25微摩尔/升)诱导的血小板聚集仍会发生。此外,我们发现GPIIb-IIIa拮抗剂对血小板释放反应(ATP和P-选择素分泌)的抑制作用较差,尤其是当使用强激动剂如TRAP来激活血小板时。GPIIb-IIIa拮抗剂对血小板促凝活性(凝血酶生成)的抑制作用取决于拮抗剂的类型和浓度以及用于诱导血小板依赖性凝血酶生成的刺激强度(凝血酶、组织因子)。目前的数据表明,GPIIb-IIIa拮抗剂之间存在显著的药理学差异,这可能对抗血栓策略和未来药物开发产生影响。