Bíró S, Russell J
Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Cambridge, UK.
Dev Psychopathol. 2001 Winter;13(1):97-110. doi: 10.1017/s0954579401001079.
Executive tasks typically contain a prepotent lure. In addition, they require individuals either to (a) follow arbitrary procedures or (b) update their model of the physical world. Recent research suggests that children with autism may be challenged only by executive tasks of the former kind (containing arbitrary rules). We asked whether this continues to be true when there is no prepotent lure, comparing performance on (a) a task with arbitrariness but without prepotency with (b) a task with both features and (c) a task with neither. The participants with autism performed at a lower level than comparison groups on the first and second task but not on the third task. This outcome is consistent with the view that autism is associated with difficulties in following arbitrary procedures per se. We try to locate difficulties with acting on the basis arbitrary rules in relation to more mainstream ideas about autistic executive dysfunction.
执行任务通常包含一个优势诱惑。此外,它们要求个体要么(a)遵循任意程序,要么(b)更新其对物理世界的模型。最近的研究表明,自闭症儿童可能仅在前者那种执行任务(包含任意规则)时面临挑战。我们探讨了当不存在优势诱惑时情况是否依然如此,比较了(a)一项具有任意性但无优势性的任务、(b)一项兼具两者特征的任务以及(c)一项两者皆无的任务的表现。自闭症参与者在第一项和第二项任务上的表现低于对照组,但在第三项任务上并非如此。这一结果与自闭症与遵循任意程序本身存在困难相关的观点一致。我们试图根据关于自闭症执行功能障碍的更主流观点,找出基于任意规则行动时的困难所在。