Suppr超能文献

鼓励药物滥用患者参加自助小组能否减少医疗保健需求?一项准实验研究。

Can encouraging substance abuse patients to participate in self-help groups reduce demand for health care? A quasi-experimental study.

作者信息

Humphreys K, Moos R

机构信息

Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California 94025, USA.

出版信息

Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2001 May;25(5):711-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Twelve-step-oriented inpatient treatment programs emphasize 12-step treatment approaches and the importance of ongoing attendance at 12-step self-help groups more than do cognitive-behavioral (CB) inpatient treatment programs. This study evaluated whether this difference in therapeutic approach leads patients who are treated in 12-step programs to rely less on professionally provided services and more on self-help groups after discharge, thereby reducing long-term health care costs.

METHODS

A prospective, quasi-experimental comparison of 12-step-based (N = 5) and cognitive-behavioral (n = 5) inpatient treatment programs was conducted. These treatments were compared on the degree to which their patients participated in self-help groups, used outpatient and inpatient mental health services, and experienced positive outcomes (e.g., abstinence) in the year following discharge. Using a larger sample from an ongoing research project, 887 male substance-dependent patients from each type of treatment program were matched on pre-intake health care costs (N = 1774). At baseline and 1-year follow-up, patients' involvement in self-help groups (e.g., Alcoholics Anonymous), utilization and costs of mental health services, and clinical outcomes were assessed.

RESULTS

Compared with patients treated in CB programs, patients treated in 12-step programs had significantly greater involvement in self-help groups at follow-up. In contrast, patients treated in CB programs averaged almost twice as many outpatient continuing care visits after discharge (22.5 visits) as patients treated in 12-step treatment programs (13.1 visits), and also received significantly more days of inpatient care (17.0 days in CB versus 10.5 in 12-step), resulting in 64% higher annual costs in CB programs ($4729/patient, p < 0.001). Psychiatric and substance abuse outcomes were comparable across treatments, except that 12-step patients had higher rates of abstinence at follow-up (45.7% versus 36.2% for patients from CB programs, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Professional treatment programs that emphasize self-help approaches increase their patients' reliance on cost-free self-help groups and thereby lower subsequent health care costs. Such programs therefore represent a cost-effective approach to promoting recovery from substance abuse.

摘要

背景

与认知行为(CB)住院治疗项目相比,以十二步为导向的住院治疗项目更强调十二步治疗方法以及持续参加十二步自助小组的重要性。本研究评估了这种治疗方法上的差异是否会导致接受十二步项目治疗的患者出院后减少对专业提供服务的依赖,更多地依赖自助小组,从而降低长期医疗保健成本。

方法

对基于十二步的(N = 5)和认知行为(n = 5)住院治疗项目进行了一项前瞻性、准实验性比较。比较了这些治疗方法的患者在出院后一年参与自助小组的程度、使用门诊和住院心理健康服务的情况以及取得积极结果(如戒酒)的情况。利用一个正在进行的研究项目中的更大样本,对每种治疗项目的887名男性物质依赖患者按照入院前医疗保健成本进行匹配(N = 1774)。在基线和1年随访时,评估了患者参与自助小组(如匿名戒酒会)的情况、心理健康服务的使用和成本以及临床结果。

结果

与接受CB项目治疗的患者相比,接受十二步项目治疗的患者在随访时参与自助小组的程度明显更高。相比之下,接受CB项目治疗的患者出院后门诊持续护理就诊的平均次数几乎是接受十二步治疗项目患者的两倍(22.5次就诊对13.1次就诊),并且接受住院护理的天数也明显更多(CB项目为17.0天,十二步项目为10.5天),导致CB项目的年度成本高出64%(每位患者4729美元,p < 0.001)。除了十二步项目的患者在随访时戒酒率更高(CB项目患者为36.2%,十二步项目患者为45.7%,p < 0.001)外,各治疗方法的精神和物质滥用结果相当。

结论

强调自助方法的专业治疗项目会增加患者对免费自助小组的依赖,从而降低后续医疗保健成本。因此,此类项目是促进从物质滥用中康复的一种具有成本效益的方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验