Siegfried N, Parry C D, Morojele N K, Wason D
Mental Health and Substance Abuse Division of the Health and Development Group and the South African Cochrane Centre, Medical Research Council (Cape Town), PO Box 19070, Tygerberg, 7505, South Africa.
Alcohol Alcohol. 2001 May-Jun;36(3):243-8. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/36.3.243.
This paper aims to: (1) profile the drinking behaviour of a rural Lesotho community facing relocation; (2) compare the following measures of hazardous drinking in this community: quantity/frequency self-report, the CAGE questionnaire and carbohydrate-deficient transferrin (CDT) levels; (3) describe community awareness of, and attitude towards, treatment services. As part of a larger baseline survey of community health status, households in 29 villages in Lesotho were randomly sampled. Consenting adults (n = 348) participated in a face-to-face interview about alcohol use, which included the CAGE. Blood was taken from participants for CDT determination. Fifty-three per cent of men (37/69) and 19% of women (53/279) reported drinking alcohol. Thirty-six per cent of men (25/69) and 9% of women (25/279) were classified as hazardous drinkers defined as drinking 350 g (males) or 225 g (females) of alcohol/week, or 'engaged in bouts of heavy drinking 1 to 2 days a month or more during the past 12 months'. Hazardous drinkers were significantly more likely to be male and older, but did not differ from the rest of the sample on marital status. Using hazardous drinking as the standard, CAGE (score > or = 2) had a positive predictive value (PPV) of 75% for men and 62% for women. The parameters for CDT must be interpreted with caution as the cut-offs for hazardous drinking, especially for women's drinking, were lower than the usual cut-offs in published CDT studies. However, the high specificities for CDT in men (100%; 19/19) and in women (77%; 110/142) are consistent with other studies, but the low PPV of 14% (5/37) for men and women combined suggests that CDT is not effective as a predictor of hazardous drinking in this population. There was high awareness of available treatment services among participants, and most believed treatment to be beneficial. Overall, the study provides a comprehensive baseline profile of drinking behaviour in this community, but did not show the CAGE questionnaire or CDT profile to be useful in in this community.
(1)剖析面临搬迁的莱索托农村社区的饮酒行为;(2)比较该社区以下几种有害饮酒的衡量方法:饮酒量/频率自我报告、CAGE问卷和缺糖转铁蛋白(CDT)水平;(3)描述社区对治疗服务的知晓情况和态度。作为对社区健康状况进行的一项更大规模基线调查的一部分,莱索托29个村庄的家庭被随机抽样。同意参与的成年人(n = 348)参加了关于饮酒情况的面对面访谈,其中包括CAGE问卷。采集参与者的血液用于测定CDT。53%的男性(37/69)和19%的女性(53/279)报告饮酒。36%的男性(25/69)和9%的女性(25/279)被归类为有害饮酒者,有害饮酒定义为每周饮用350克(男性)或225克(女性)酒精,或“在过去12个月内每月有1至2天或更多天大量饮酒”。有害饮酒者更有可能是男性且年龄较大,但在婚姻状况方面与其余样本无差异。以有害饮酒为标准,CAGE(得分≥2)对男性的阳性预测值(PPV)为75%,对女性为62%。由于有害饮酒的临界值,特别是女性饮酒的临界值低于已发表的CDT研究中的通常临界值,因此对CDT参数的解读必须谨慎。然而,CDT在男性(100%;19/19)和女性(77%;110/142)中的高特异性与其他研究一致,但男性和女性综合起来的低PPV为14%(5/37),这表明CDT在该人群中并非预测有害饮酒的有效指标。参与者对现有治疗服务的知晓度较高,且大多数人认为治疗有益。总体而言,该研究提供了该社区饮酒行为的全面基线概况,但未表明CAGE问卷或CDT概况在该社区有用。