Tilford J M, Simpson P M, Yeh T S, Lensing S, Aitken M E, Green J W, Harr J, Fiser D H
Department of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences and Arkansas Children's Hospital, Little Rock, AR 72202-3591, USA.
Crit Care Med. 2001 May;29(5):1056-61. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200105000-00037.
This study was undertaken to examine variation in therapies and outcome for pediatric head trauma patients by patient characteristics and by pediatric intensive care unit. Specifically, the study was designed to examine severity of illness on admission to the pediatric intensive care unit, the therapies used during the pediatric intensive care unit stay, and patient outcomes.
Consecutive admissions from three pediatric intensive care units were recorded prospectively (n = 5,749). For this study, all patients with an admitting diagnosis of head trauma were included (n = 477). Data collection occurred during an 18-month period beginning in June 1996. All of the pediatric intensive care units were located in children's hospitals, had residency and fellowship training programs, and were headed by a pediatric intensivist.
Admission severity was measured as the worst recorded physiological derangement during the period <or=6 hrs before pediatric intensive care unit admission. Therapies and resource use were based on the Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System with adaptations for pediatrics. The use of intracranial pressure monitoring was recorded on admission to the unit (within 1 hr) and at any time during the pediatric intensive care unit stay. Outcomes were measured at the time of pediatric intensive care unit discharge by the Pediatric Overall Performance Category scale. Risk factors for mortality were examined by using bivariate analyses with significant predictors as candidate variables in a logistic regression to predict expected mortality. Intracranial pressure monitoring and other therapies were added to the mortality prediction model to test for protective effects. Finally, race and insurance status were added to the model to test for differences in the quality of care.
The overall mortality rate for the entire sample was 7.8%. Mortality rates for children <or=1 yr old were significantly higher than for children >1 yr old (16.1% vs. 6.1%; p = .002). Comparisons by insurance status indicated that observed mortality rates were highest for self-paying patients. However, patient characteristics were not associated with use of therapies or standardized mortality rates after adjustment for patient severity. There was significant variation in the use of paralytic agents, seizure medications, induced hypothermia, and intracranial pressure monitoring on admission across the three pediatric intensive care units. In multivariate models, only the use of seizure medications was associated significantly with reduced mortality risk (odds ratio = 0.17; 95% confidence interval = 0.04-0.70; p = .014).
Therapies and outcomes vary across pediatric intensive care units that care for children with head injuries. Increased use of seizure medications may be warranted based on data from this observational study. Large randomized controlled trials of seizure prophylaxis in children with head injury have not been conducted and are needed to confirm the findings presented here.
本研究旨在通过患者特征及儿科重症监护病房来考察小儿头部创伤患者的治疗方法及治疗结果的差异。具体而言,该研究旨在考察小儿重症监护病房入院时的疾病严重程度、小儿重症监护病房住院期间所采用的治疗方法以及患者的治疗结果。
前瞻性记录了来自三个儿科重症监护病房的连续入院患者(n = 5749)。本研究纳入了所有入院诊断为头部创伤的患者(n = 477)。数据收集于1996年6月开始的18个月期间。所有儿科重症监护病房均位于儿童医院,设有住院医师和专科医师培训项目,且由一名儿科重症医学专家负责。
入院严重程度以小儿重症监护病房入院前≤6小时期间记录的最严重生理紊乱情况来衡量。治疗方法及资源使用情况基于治疗干预评分系统并针对儿科进行了调整。颅内压监测的使用情况在患者入院时(1小时内)及小儿重症监护病房住院期间的任何时间进行记录。治疗结果在小儿重症监护病房出院时采用儿科总体表现分类量表进行衡量。通过双变量分析来考察死亡风险因素,并将显著预测因素作为逻辑回归中的候选变量以预测预期死亡率。将颅内压监测及其他治疗方法纳入死亡率预测模型以检验其保护作用。最后,将种族和保险状况纳入模型以检验医疗质量的差异。
整个样本的总体死亡率为7.8%。1岁及以下儿童的死亡率显著高于大于1岁的儿童(16.1%对6.1%;p = 0.002)。按保险状况进行的比较表明,自费患者的观察到的死亡率最高。然而,在对患者严重程度进行调整后,患者特征与治疗方法的使用或标准化死亡率无关。在三个儿科重症监护病房中,入院时在使用麻痹剂、抗癫痫药物、诱导低温及颅内压监测方面存在显著差异。在多变量模型中,只有抗癫痫药物的使用与降低死亡风险显著相关(比值比 = 0.17;95%置信区间 = 0.04 - 0.70;p = 0.014)。
在照顾头部受伤儿童的儿科重症监护病房中,治疗方法及治疗结果存在差异。基于本观察性研究的数据,可能有必要增加抗癫痫药物的使用。尚未开展针对头部受伤儿童癫痫预防的大型随机对照试验,需要进行此类试验以证实此处呈现的研究结果。