Waterhouse J, Folkard S, Van Dongen H, Minors D, Owens D, Kerkhof G, Weinert D, Nevill A, Macdonald I, Sytnik N, Tucker P
Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, England, UK.
Chronobiol Int. 2001 Mar;18(2):227-47. doi: 10.1081/cbi-100103188.
There were 15 healthy female subjects, differing in their position on the "morningness-eveningness" scale, studied for 7 consecutive days, first while living a sedentary lifestyle and sleeping between midnight and 08:00 and then while undergoing a "constant routine." Rectal temperature was measured at regular intervals throughout this time, and the results were subjected to cosinor analysis both before and after "purification" for the effects of physical activity. Results showed that there was a phase difference in the circadian rhythm of core temperature that was associated with the morningness score, with calculations that "morning types" would be phased earlier than "evening types" by up to about 3 h. This difference in phase (which was also statistically significant when the group was divided by a median split into a "morning group" and an "evening group") could not be attributed to effects of waking activity and existed in spite of the subjects keeping the same sleep-wake schedule. Moreover, it persisted when the subjects' data had been purified and when the data were obtained from the constant routine. That is, there was an endogenous component to this difference in phase of the core temperature. The morning group also showed a greater fall of core temperature during sleep; this was assessed in two ways, the main one being a comparison of constant routine and nychthemeral data sets after correction for any effects of activity. Even though the morning group was sleeping at a later phase of their circadian temperature rhythm than was the evening group, neither group showed a fall of temperature due to sleep that varied with time elapsed since the temperature acrophase. It is concluded that another factor that differs between morning and evening types is responsible for this difference.
有15名健康女性受试者,她们在“晨型-夜型”量表上的位置不同,连续7天接受研究。首先是在久坐不动的生活方式下,于午夜至08:00之间睡眠,然后进行“固定作息”。在此期间定期测量直肠温度,在对身体活动的影响进行“净化”前后,对结果进行余弦分析。结果表明,核心体温的昼夜节律存在相位差异,该差异与晨型得分相关,计算得出“晨型人”的相位比“夜型人”早约3小时。这种相位差异(当按中位数分割将该组分为“晨型组”和“夜型组”时,在统计学上也具有显著性)不能归因于清醒活动的影响,尽管受试者保持相同的睡眠-清醒时间表,这种差异仍然存在。此外,当对受试者的数据进行净化后以及从固定作息中获得数据时,这种差异仍然存在。也就是说,核心体温相位差异中存在内源性成分。晨型组在睡眠期间核心体温下降幅度也更大;这通过两种方式进行评估,主要方式是在对活动的任何影响进行校正后,比较固定作息和昼夜数据集。尽管晨型组在其昼夜体温节律的较晚阶段睡眠,而夜型组则不然,但两组均未显示出因睡眠导致的体温下降随体温峰值相位后经过的时间而变化。研究得出结论,晨型人和夜型人之间存在差异的另一个因素是造成这种差异的原因。