Conley R R
Maryland Psychiatric Research Center, Department of Psychiatry, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore 21228, USA.
J Clin Psychiatry. 2001;62 Suppl 9:23-6; discussion 27-8.
Schizophrenia is too often a severely disabling disease, and the discovery of interventions that can ease or eliminate symptoms without troubling side effects has long been the goal of schizophrenia research. In this endeavor, researchers, clinicians, and patients all desire an optimal outcome; outcome measures, which measure the relative success or failure of an intervention, are accordingly important. In addition, the costs of pharmacologic interventions-particularly of the atypical antipsychotics--in schizophrenia make the optimal measurement of treatment outcomes critical. Sometimes outcomes are focused on minimizing costly events, such as rehospitalization, rather than focusing on patient-oriented outcomes. This article discusses the outcome measures employed in 5 clinical trials comparing atypical antipsychotics, examining their usefulness and suggesting types of outcome measures that may be useful in the future.
精神分裂症常常是一种严重致残的疾病,长期以来,寻找能够缓解或消除症状且无不良副作用的干预措施一直是精神分裂症研究的目标。在这项工作中,研究人员、临床医生和患者都期望获得最佳结果;因此,衡量干预措施相对成败的结果指标非常重要。此外,精神分裂症药物干预(尤其是非典型抗精神病药物)的成本使得对治疗结果进行最佳衡量至关重要。有时结果侧重于将诸如再次住院等代价高昂的事件降至最低,而不是关注以患者为导向的结果。本文讨论了5项比较非典型抗精神病药物的临床试验中所采用的结果指标,评估了它们的实用性,并提出了未来可能有用的结果指标类型。