Early beneficial effect of preservation of papillo-annular continuity in mitral valve replacement on left ventricular function.

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY

Impairment of left ventricular (LV) function after mitral valve replacement (MVR) has been the most important factor to determine morbidity and mortality. With this in mind, LV performance in the postoperative period was assessed with and without preservation of papillo-annular continuity in MVR.

METHODS

Between March 1994 and August 1998, a total of 383 valve prostheses (202 MVR, 65 AVR, 58 MVR+AVR) were implanted in 325 patients, 177 of whom underwent MVR with Starr Edwards ball cage prostheses (the study group). Of these 177 patients, 105 had MVR with preservation of the posterior mitral leaflet (group I), and 72 had conventional MVR (group II). Predominant lesions were mitral stenosis in 81, mitral regurgitation in 42, and mixed mitral lesion (MS/MR) in 54. Concomitant tricuspid valve annuloplasty was performed in 13, and atrial septal defect repair in five. Sixteen patients underwent MVR for mitral restenosis. In-vivo performance of the prostheses and LV function was evaluated by M-mode and Doppler echocardiography.

RESULTS

At 3-6 months clinical improvement was seen in NYHA class, with reduction in cardiothoracic ratio among patients with preserved papillo-annular continuity, irrespective of lesion type. Significant reductions (p <0.05) were seen in left atrial dimensions (54.10 +/- 8.79 preop. versus 44.64 +/- 8.54 postop.; p <0.05), left ventricular end-diastolic dimensions (LVEDD) (50.84 +/- 10.42 preop. versus 41.21 +/- 7.16 postop.; p <0.05) and end-systolic dimensions (LVESD) (34.76 +/- 7.94 preop. versus 28.81 +/- 5.79 postop.; p <0.05) in patients who had their posterior mitral leaflet preserved with significant improvement in ejection fraction (60.31 +/- 8.22 versus 64.47 +/- 7.93; p <0.05). Further analysis of data in group I patients showed significant reductions in left atrial dimensions, LVESD and peak gradient, along with improved ejection fraction compared with conventional (group II) patients.

CONCLUSION

Deterioration in LV function in patients undergoing conventional MVR indicates chordal resection as a putative mechanism. This study supports the concept that maintenance of continuity between the mitral annulus and papillary muscles has a beneficial effect on postoperative LV function, and is particularly important in patients with mitral stenosis with depressed preoperative LV systolic function.