Suppr超能文献

国际疾病分类第9版(ICD - 9)与第10版(ICD - 10)之间死因的可比性:初步估计

Comparability of cause of death between ICD-9 and ICD-10: preliminary estimates.

作者信息

Anderson R N, Miniño A M, Hoyert D L, Rosenberg H M

出版信息

Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2001 May 18;49(2):1-32.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This report presents preliminary results describing the effects of implementing the Tenth Revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) on mortality statistics for selected causes of death effective with deaths occurring in the United States in 1999. The report also describes major features of the Tenth Revision (ICD-10), including changes from the Ninth Revision (ICD-9) in classification and rules for selecting underlying causes of death. Application of comparability ratios is also discussed.

METHODS

The report is based on cause-of-death information from a large sample of 1996 death certificates filed in the 50 States and the District of Columbia. Cause-of-death information in the sample includes underlying cause of death classified by both ICD-9 and ICD-10. Because the data file on which comparability information is derived is incomplete, results are preliminary.

RESULTS

Preliminary comparability ratios by cause of death presented in this report indicate the extent of discontinuities in cause-of-death trends from 1998 through 1999 resulting from implementing ICD-10. For some leading causes (e.g., Septicemia, Influenza and pneumonia, Alzheimer's disease, and Nephritis, nephrotic syndrome and nephrosis), the discontinuity in trend is substantial. The ranking of leading causes of death is also substantially affected for some causes of death.

CONCLUSIONS

Results of this study, although preliminary, are essential to analyzing trends in mortality between ICD-9 and ICD-10. In particular, the results provide a means for interpreting changes between 1998, which is the last year in which ICD-9 was used, and 1999, the year in which ICD-10 was implemented for mortality in the United States.

摘要

目标

本报告呈现了初步结果,描述了实施《国际疾病分类第十次修订本》(ICD - 10)对1999年在美国发生死亡的特定死因死亡率统计的影响。该报告还描述了第十次修订本(ICD - 10)的主要特征,包括与第九次修订本(ICD - 9)在分类以及选择死亡根本原因规则方面的变化。同时也讨论了可比性比率的应用。

方法

本报告基于从50个州和哥伦比亚特区提交的1996年大量死亡证明中获取的死因信息。样本中的死因信息包括按照ICD - 9和ICD - 10分类的死亡根本原因。由于得出可比性信息的数据文件不完整,结果是初步的。

结果

本报告中按死因呈现的初步可比性比率表明了由于实施ICD - 10导致的1998年至1999年死因趋势不连续性的程度。对于一些主要死因(如败血症、流感和肺炎、阿尔茨海默病以及肾炎、肾病综合征和肾病),趋势的不连续性很大。某些死因的主要死因排名也受到了实质性影响。

结论

本研究结果虽然是初步的,但对于分析ICD - 9和ICD - 10之间的死亡率趋势至关重要。特别是,这些结果提供了一种方法,用于解释1998年(ICD - 9使用的最后一年)与1999年(美国实施ICD - 10用于死亡率统计的年份)之间的变化。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验