Smith K L, Peeters A, McNeil J J
Monash Medical School, Monash University, Alfred Hospital, Commercial Rd., Vic. 3181, Prahran, Australia.
Resuscitation. 2001 May;49(2):143-50. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(00)00355-5.
We aimed to reduce response times and time to defibrillation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients through fire first-responders equipped with automatic external defibrillators (AEDs). The fire first-responders were added as an extra tier to the existing two-tired ambulance response.
This prospective controlled trial set in Melbourne, Australia, consisted of a control area (277 km2, population density 2343/km2-ambulance only dispatch) and a pilot area (171 km2, population density 2290/km2-ambulance and fire first-responder dispatch). The main outcome measures were time to emergency medical service (EMS) arrival at scene for all cardiac arrest patients and time to defibrillation for cardiac arrest patients presenting in ventricular fibrillation (VF). The study participants were patients who suffered a cardiac arrest of presumed cardiac aetiology for which a priority 0 emergency response was activated. A total of 268 patients were located in the control area and 161 in the pilot (intervention) area.
The mean response time to arrival at scene was reduced by 1.60 (95% CI 1.21, 1.99) min, P < 0.001. A large reduction in prolonged responses (> or = 10 min) to cardiac arrests was also observed in the pilot area (2%) compared with the control area (18%), chi = 23.19, P < 0.001. Mean time to defibrillation was reduced by 1.43 (95% CI 0.11, 2.98) min, P = 0.068.
The results from this study suggest that fire officers can be successfully trained in the use of AEDs and can integrate well into a medical response role. The combined response of ambulance and fire personnel significantly reduced the response interval and reduced time to defibrillation. This suggests that in appropriate situations other agencies could be considered for involvement in co-ordinated first-responder programs.
我们旨在通过配备自动体外除颤器(AED)的消防急救人员,减少院外心脏骤停患者的响应时间和除颤时间。消防急救人员作为额外的一层,被添加到现有的两级救护车响应体系中。
这项前瞻性对照试验在澳大利亚墨尔本进行,包括一个对照区域(277平方公里,人口密度2343/平方公里,仅派遣救护车)和一个试点区域(171平方公里,人口密度2290/平方公里,派遣救护车和消防急救人员)。主要结局指标是所有心脏骤停患者的紧急医疗服务(EMS)到达现场的时间,以及出现心室颤动(VF)的心脏骤停患者的除颤时间。研究参与者是因推测为心脏病因导致心脏骤停且启动了0级优先应急响应的患者。对照区域共有268名患者,试点(干预)区域有161名患者。
到达现场的平均响应时间减少了1.60(95%CI 1.21,1.99)分钟,P<0.001。与对照区域(18%)相比,试点区域心脏骤停的长时间响应(≥10分钟)也大幅减少(2%),χ=23.19,P<0.001。平均除颤时间减少了1.43(95%CI 0.11,2.98)分钟,P=0.068。
本研究结果表明,消防人员可以成功接受AED使用培训,并能很好地融入医疗响应角色。救护车和消防人员的联合响应显著缩短了响应间隔并减少了除颤时间。这表明在适当情况下,可以考虑其他机构参与协调的急救响应计划。