Suppr超能文献

丙咪嗪与帕罗西汀治疗双相抑郁的双盲、安慰剂对照比较

Double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison of imipramine and paroxetine in the treatment of bipolar depression.

作者信息

Nemeroff C B, Evans D L, Gyulai L, Sachs G S, Bowden C L, Gergel I P, Oakes R, Pitts C D

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, 1639 Pierce Dr., Suite 4000, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.

出版信息

Am J Psychiatry. 2001 Jun;158(6):906-12. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.158.6.906.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study compared the efficacy and safety of paroxetine and imipramine with that of placebo in the treatment of bipolar depression in adult outpatients stabilized on a regimen of lithium.

METHOD

In a double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 117 outpatients with DSM-III-R bipolar disorder, depressive phase, were randomly assigned to treatment with paroxetine (N=35), imipramine (N=39), or placebo (N=43) for 10 weeks. In addition to lithium monotherapy, patients may have received either carbamazepine or valproate in combination with lithium for control of manic symptoms. Patients were stratified on the basis of trough serum lithium levels determined at the screening visit (high: >0.8 meq/liter; low: </=0.8 meq/liter). Primary efficacy was assessed by change from baseline in scores on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression and the Clinical Global Impression illness severity scale.

RESULTS

Differences in overall efficacy among the three groups were not statistically significant. For patients with high serum lithium levels, antidepressant response at endpoint also did not significantly differ from placebo. However, both paroxetine and imipramine were superior to placebo for patients with low serum lithium levels. Compared to imipramine, paroxetine resulted in a lower incidence of adverse events, most notably emergence of manic symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Antidepressants may not be useful adjunctive therapy for bipolar depressed patients with high serum lithium levels. However, antidepressant therapy may be beneficial for patients who cannot tolerate high serum lithium levels or who have symptoms that are refractory to the antidepressant effects of lithium.

摘要

目的

本研究比较了帕罗西汀、丙咪嗪与安慰剂对接受锂盐治疗方案病情稳定的成年门诊双相抑郁症患者的疗效和安全性。

方法

在一项双盲、安慰剂对照研究中,117例处于抑郁发作期的DSM-III-R双相情感障碍门诊患者被随机分配接受帕罗西汀(N = 35)、丙咪嗪(N = 39)或安慰剂(N = 43)治疗10周。除锂盐单一疗法外,患者可能还接受了卡马西平或丙戊酸盐与锂盐联合治疗以控制躁狂症状。患者根据筛查访视时测定的血清锂盐谷浓度分层(高:>0.8毫当量/升;低:≤0.8毫当量/升)。主要疗效通过汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表得分和临床总体印象疾病严重程度量表从基线的变化来评估。

结果

三组之间的总体疗效差异无统计学意义。对于血清锂盐水平高的患者,终点时的抗抑郁反应与安慰剂相比也无显著差异。然而,对于血清锂盐水平低的患者,帕罗西汀和丙咪嗪均优于安慰剂。与丙咪嗪相比,帕罗西汀导致的不良事件发生率更低,最显著的是躁狂症状的出现。

结论

抗抑郁药可能对血清锂盐水平高的双相抑郁症患者不是有用的辅助治疗。然而,抗抑郁治疗可能对不能耐受高血清锂盐水平或对锂盐的抗抑郁作用有难治性症状的患者有益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验