Aiba T, Shimizu W, Taguchi A, Suyama K, Kurita T, Aihara N, Kamakura S
Department of Internal Medicine, National Cardiovascular Center, Osaka, Suita, Japan.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2001 May;12(5):511-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2001.00511.x.
It often is difficult to determine the optimal ablation site for idiopathic ventricular tachycardia (VT) originating from the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) when the VT or premature ventricular complex (PVC) does not occur frequently. The aim of our study was to evaluate the usefulness of a multielectrode basket catheter for ablation of idiopathic VT originating from the RVOT.
Radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation was performed using a 4-mm tip, quadripolar catheter in 50 consecutive patients with 81 VTs originating from the RVOT with (basket group = 25 patients with 45 VTs) or without (control group = 25 patients with 36 VTs) predeployment of a multielectrode basket catheter composed of 64 electrodes. Deployment of the multielectrode basket catheter was possible and safe in all 25 patients in the basket group. Ablation was successful in 25 (100%) of 25 patients in the basket group and in 22 (88%) of 25 patients in the control group. The total number of RF applications and the number of RF applications per PVC morphology did not differ between the two groups. However, both the fluoroscopic and ablation procedure times per PVC morphology were shorter in the basket group than in the control group (36.8+/-14.1 min vs 52.0+/-32.5 min, P = 0.04; 60.0+/-14.6 vs 81.5+/-51.2 min, P = 0.05). This difference was more pronounced in the 29 patients in whom VT or PVC was not frequently observed.
The multielectrode basket catheter is safe and useful for determining the optimal ablation site in patients with idiopathic VT originating from the RVOT, especially in those without frequent VT or PVC.
当室性心动过速(VT)或室性早搏(PVC)不频繁发生时,确定起源于右心室流出道(RVOT)的特发性室性心动过速的最佳消融部位通常很困难。我们研究的目的是评估多电极篮状导管对起源于RVOT的特发性室性心动过速消融的有效性。
连续50例起源于RVOT的室性心动过速患者接受射频(RF)导管消融,其中25例患者(45次室性心动过速)预先部署了由64个电极组成的多电极篮状导管(篮状组),25例患者(36次室性心动过速)未预先部署(对照组),使用4毫米尖端的四极导管进行消融。篮状组的所有25例患者均成功部署了多电极篮状导管,且过程安全。篮状组25例患者中有25例(100%)消融成功,对照组25例患者中有22例(88%)消融成功。两组之间的射频应用总数和每种PVC形态的射频应用次数没有差异。然而,篮状组每种PVC形态的透视时间和消融操作时间均短于对照组(36.8±14.1分钟对52.0±32.5分钟,P = 0.04;60.0±14.6对81.5±51.2分钟,P = 0.05)。这种差异在29例室性心动过速或PVC不频繁的患者中更为明显。
多电极篮状导管对于确定起源于RVOT的特发性室性心动过速患者的最佳消融部位是安全且有效的,尤其是对于那些室性心动过速或PVC不频繁的患者。