Post P N, Stiggelbout A M, Wakker P P
Department of Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Center, Netherlands.
Stroke. 2001 Jun;32(6):1425-9. doi: 10.1161/01.str.32.6.1425.
To perform decision analyses that include stroke as one of the possible health states, the utilities of stroke states must be determined. We reviewed the literature to obtain estimates of the utility of stroke and explored the impact of the study population and the elicitation method.
We searched various databases for articles reporting empirical assessment of utilities. Mean utilities of major stroke (Rankin Scale 4 to 5) and minor stroke (Rankin Scale 2 to 3) were calculated, stratified by study population and elicitation method. Additionally, the modified Rankin Scale was mapped onto the EuroQol classification system. Utilities were obtained from 23 articles. Patients at risk for stroke assigned utilities of 0.26 and 0.55 to major and minor stroke, respectively. Stroke survivors assigned higher utilities to both major (0.41) and minor stroke (0.72). The EuroQol completed by stroke survivors revealed a utility of 0.32 and 0.71 for major and minor stroke, respectively. Utilities elicited by the Standard Gamble were generally higher, while those obtained by the Visual Analogue Scale were lower than the Time Trade Off values. Remaining variation between utilities may be caused by differences in definitions of the health states. The mapped EuroQol indicated a utility of 0.64 for minor stroke and a value just below zero for major stroke.
For minor stroke, a utility between 0.50 and 0.70 seems to be reasonable for both decision analyses and cost-effectiveness studies. The utility of major stroke may range between 0 and 0.30 and may possibly be negative.
为了进行包括中风作为可能健康状态之一的决策分析,必须确定中风状态的效用值。我们回顾了文献以获取中风效用值的估计,并探讨了研究人群和赋值方法的影响。
我们在各种数据库中搜索报告效用值实证评估的文章。计算了重度中风(Rankin量表4至5级)和轻度中风(Rankin量表2至3级)的平均效用值,并按研究人群和赋值方法进行分层。此外,将改良的Rankin量表映射到欧洲五维健康量表分类系统。从23篇文章中获取了效用值。有中风风险的患者对重度和轻度中风分别赋予的效用值为0.26和0.55。中风幸存者对重度(0.41)和轻度中风(0.72)赋予的效用值更高。中风幸存者完成的欧洲五维健康量表显示,重度和轻度中风的效用值分别为0.32和0.71。通过标准博弈法得出的效用值通常较高,而通过视觉模拟量表得出的效用值低于时间权衡法得出的值。效用值之间的其余差异可能是由健康状态定义的不同所致。映射后的欧洲五维健康量表显示轻度中风的效用值为0.64,重度中风的效用值略低于零。
对于轻度中风,在决策分析和成本效益研究中,0.50至0.70之间的效用值似乎是合理的。重度中风的效用值可能在0至0.30之间,甚至可能为负。