Suppr超能文献

QRS波时限延长会增加QT离散度,但与急性心肌梗死幸存者的心律失常无关。

Prolonged QRS duration increases QT dispersion but does not relate to arrhythmias in survivors of acute myocardial infarction.

作者信息

Kirchhof P, Eckardt L, Arslan O, Reinhardt L, Mönnig G, Fetsch T, Breithardt G, Borggrefe M, Haverkamp W

机构信息

Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Hospital Münster, and Institute of Arteriosclerosis Research, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.

出版信息

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2001 May;24(5):789-95. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2001.00789.x.

Abstract

QT dispersion has been suggested and disputed as a risk marker for ventricular arrhythmias after myocardial infarction. Delayed ventricular activation after myocardial infarction may affect arrhythmic risk and QT intervals. This study determined if delayed activation as assessed by (1) QRS duration in the 12-lead ECG and by (2) late potentials in the signal-averaged ECG affects QT dispersion and its ability to assess arrhythmic risk after myocardial infarction. QT duration, JT duration, QT dispersion, and JT dispersion were compared to QRS duration in the 12-lead ECG and to late potentials in the signal-averaged ECG recorded in 724 patients 2-3 weeks after myocardial infarction. Prolonged QRS duration (> 110 ms) and high QRS dispersion increased QT and JT dispersion by 12%-15% (P < 0.05). Presence of late potentials, in contrast, did not change QT dispersion. Only the presence of late potentials (n = 113) was related to arrhythmic events during 6-month follow-up. QT dispersion, JT dispersion, QRS duration, and QRS dispersion were equal in patients with (n = 29) and without arrhythmic events (QT disp 80 +/- 7 vs 78 +/- 1 ms, JT disp 80 +/- 6 vs 79 +/- 2 ms, mean +/- SEM, P > 0.2). In conclusion, prolonged QRS duration increases QT dispersion irrespective of arrhythmic events in survivors of myocardial infarction. Presence of late potentials, in contrast, relates to arrhythmic events but does not affect QT dispersion. Therefore, QT dispersion may not be an adequate parameter to assess arrhythmic risk in survivors of myocardial infarction.

摘要

QT离散度作为心肌梗死后室性心律失常的风险标志物,一直存在争议。心肌梗死后心室激活延迟可能影响心律失常风险和QT间期。本研究旨在确定通过(1)12导联心电图的QRS时限和(2)信号平均心电图中的晚电位评估的激活延迟是否会影响QT离散度及其评估心肌梗死后心律失常风险的能力。将724例心肌梗死后2 - 3周患者记录的12导联心电图中的QT时限、JT时限、QT离散度和JT离散度与QRS时限以及信号平均心电图中的晚电位进行比较。QRS时限延长(>110 ms)和高QRS离散度使QT和JT离散度增加12% - 15%(P < 0.05)。相比之下,晚电位的存在并未改变QT离散度。仅晚电位的存在(n = 113)与6个月随访期间的心律失常事件相关。有(n = 29)和无心律失常事件的患者的QT离散度、JT离散度、QRS时限和QRS离散度相等(QT离散度80 +/- 7 vs 78 +/- 1 ms,JT离散度80 +/- 6 vs 79 +/- 2 ms,均值 +/- 标准误,P > 0.2)。总之,在心肌梗死幸存者中,无论有无心律失常事件,QRS时限延长都会增加QT离散度。相比之下,晚电位的存在与心律失常事件相关,但不影响QT离散度。因此,QT离散度可能不是评估心肌梗死幸存者心律失常风险的合适参数。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验