Geddes J, Goodwin G
Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, UK.
Br J Psychiatry. 2001 Jun;178(Suppl 41):S191-4.
Background The increasing use of the methods of evidence-based medicine to keep up-to-date with the research literature highlights the absence of high-quality evidence in many areas in psychiatry. Aims To outline current uncertainties in the maintenance treatment of bipolar disorder and to describe some of the decisions involved in designing a large simple trial. Method We describe some of the strategies of evidence-based medicine, and how they can be applied in practice, focusing specifically on the area of bipolar disorder. Results One of the key clinical uncertainties in the treatment of bipolar disorder is the place of maintenance drug treatments and their relative efficacy. A large-scale study, the Bipolar Affective DISORDER: Lithium Anticonvulsant Evaluation (BALANCE) trial, is proposed to compare the effectiveness of lithium, valproate and the combination of lithium and valproate. Conclusions Providing reliable answers to key clinical questions in psychiatry will require new approaches to clinical trials. These will need to be far larger than previously appreciated and will therefore need to be collaborative ventures involving front-line clinicians.
背景 循证医学方法在紧跟研究文献方面的应用日益增加,这凸显了精神病学许多领域缺乏高质量证据的问题。
目的 概述双相情感障碍维持治疗当前存在的不确定性,并描述设计一项大型简单试验所涉及的一些决策。
方法 我们描述了循证医学的一些策略以及它们如何在实践中应用,特别关注双相情感障碍领域。
结果 双相情感障碍治疗中关键的临床不确定性之一是维持药物治疗的地位及其相对疗效。一项大型研究,即双相情感障碍:锂盐与抗惊厥药评估(BALANCE)试验,被提议用来比较锂盐、丙戊酸盐以及锂盐与丙戊酸盐联合使用的有效性。
结论 为精神病学关键临床问题提供可靠答案将需要临床试验的新方法。这些试验规模将比之前认为的要大得多,因此需要一线临床医生参与的合作项目。