Cotts W G, Johnson M R
Heart Failure/Cardiac Transplant Program, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois 60611, USA.
Heart Fail Rev. 2001 Sep;6(3):227-40. doi: 10.1023/a:1011414307636.
Since the first human heart transplantation was performed in 1967, the field of heart transplantation has advanced to the point where survival and acceptable quality of life are commonplace. Despite remarkable progress in the clinical management of rejection, rejection continues to limit survival and quality of life in the heart transplant population. This review will discuss the biologic processes involved in hyperacute rejection, acute rejection, and humoral (vascular) rejection. The development of endomyocardial biopsy techniques represented a significant advancement in the diagnosis of cardiac rejection, and endomyocardial biopsy remains the 'gold standard' in the diagnosis of cellular rejection. To date, no noninvasive parameters will diagnose rejection with adequate sensitivity and specificity. Biopsy frequency and immunosuppressive therapies may be tailored to the risk of rejection. Immunosuppression for cardiac transplantation can be divided into three major phases: 1) perioperative immunosuppression; 2) maintenance immunosuppression, and; 3) treatment of rejection. The strategy for treating transplant rejection should be influenced by several variables: 1) Histologic grade of rejection; 2) Evidence of hemodynamic compromise by ejection fraction or right heart catheterization; 3) Severity of previous rejection episodes and types of immunosuppressives used; and 4) Risk factors for rejection, including time after transplantation. Future rejection therapy will involve more sophisticated attempts to alter host responses toward the donor organ in a more specific and selective way. Despite considerable advances in the care of the heart transplant recipient, long-term survival is limited by cardiac allograft vasculopathy. The final section of this chapter will review the pathology, immunopathology, nonimmunologic risk factors, diagnosis, prevention and treatment of allograft vasculopathy.
自1967年首次进行人体心脏移植以来,心脏移植领域已取得长足进展,如今患者存活及生活质量达到可接受水平已属常见。尽管在排斥反应的临床管理方面取得了显著进展,但排斥反应仍是限制心脏移植患者存活和生活质量的因素。本综述将讨论超急性排斥反应、急性排斥反应和体液(血管)排斥反应所涉及的生物学过程。心内膜活检技术的发展是心脏排斥反应诊断方面的一项重大进步,心内膜活检仍是细胞性排斥反应诊断的“金标准”。迄今为止,尚无任何非侵入性参数能够以足够的敏感性和特异性诊断排斥反应。活检频率和免疫抑制疗法可根据排斥反应风险进行调整。心脏移植的免疫抑制可分为三个主要阶段:1)围手术期免疫抑制;2)维持性免疫抑制;3)排斥反应的治疗。治疗移植排斥反应的策略应受几个变量影响:1)排斥反应的组织学分级;2)通过射血分数或右心导管检查证明存在血流动力学损害;3)既往排斥反应发作的严重程度及所用免疫抑制剂的类型;4)排斥反应的危险因素,包括移植后的时间。未来的排斥反应治疗将涉及更复杂的尝试,以更特异和选择性的方式改变宿主对供体器官的反应。尽管在心脏移植受者的护理方面取得了相当大的进展,但心脏移植血管病变限制了长期存活。本章最后一部分将综述移植血管病变的病理学、免疫病理学、非免疫性危险因素、诊断、预防和治疗。