Houghton J D, Hays G C
School of Biological Sciences, University of Wales Swansea, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK.
Naturwissenschaften. 2001 Mar;88(3):133-6. doi: 10.1007/s001140100212.
For many decades it has been accepted that marine turtle hatchlings from the same nest generally emerge from the sand together. However, for loggerhead turtles (Caretta caretta) nesting on the Greek Island of Kefalonia, a more asynchronous pattern of emergence has been documented. By placing temperature loggers at the top and bottom of nests laid on Kefalonia during 1998, we examined whether this asynchronous emergence was related to the thermal conditions within nests. Pronounced thermal variation existed not only between, but also within, individual nests. These within-nest temperature differences were related to the patterns of hatchling emergence, with hatchlings from nests displaying large thermal ranges emerging over a longer time-scale than those characterised by more uniform temperatures. In many egg-laying animals, parental care of the offspring may continue while the eggs are incubating and also after they have hatched. Consequently, the importance of the nest site for determining incubation conditions may be reduced since the parents themselves may alter the local environment. By contrast, in marine turtles, parental care ceases once the eggs have been laid and the nest site covered. The positioning of the nest site, in both space and time, may therefore have profound effects for marine turtles by affecting, for example, the survival of the eggs and hatchlings as well as their sex (Janzen and Paukstis 1991). During incubation, sea turtle embryos grow from a few cells at oviposition to a self-sufficient organism at hatching some 50-80 days later (Ackerman 1997). After hatching, the young turtles dig up through the sand and emerge typically en masse at the surface 1-7 nights later, with a number of stragglers following over the next few nights (Christens 1990). This contrasts with the frequently observed pattern of hatching asynchrony in birds. It has been suggested that the cause of mass emergence in turtles is that eggs within a clutch are fertilised within a short period of time and then, when thermal conditions within the nest are uniform, develop at very similar rates and hence hatch and emerge together (Porter 1972). As a corollary of this idea, it would be predicted that when there are pronounced within-nest thermal gradients, development rates of siblings will be different and hence asynchronous hatching and emergence might occur. While it may be energetically beneficial for hatchlings to emerge in a group (Carr and Hirth 1961), if the extent of hatching asynchrony is marked then there may be severe costs for individuals if they wait for all their siblings to hatch before attempting to dig out of the sand (Hays and Speakman 1992). Under such conditions, the protracted emergence of small groups of hatchlings over several nights may be favoured. Examination of the literature suggests that emergence asynchrony may be more widespread than generally considered. For example, Witherington et al. (1990) described loggerhead turtle hatchlings (Caretta caretta) emerging over 4 days in Florida; for green turtles (Chelonia mydas), Hendrickson (1958) documented that nests in Malaysia and Sarawak produced hatchlings for up to 8 days; whilst Diamond (1976) found that hawksbill (Eretmochelys imbricata) nests on Cousin Island, Seychelles, were active for up to 4 days. Similarly, on the Greek Island of Kefalonia, we have shown that emergence from individual loggerhead turtle nests may occur on up to 11 nights (Hays and Speakman 1992). It is logical to suppose that asynchronous emergence relates to thermal gradients within nests, since the incubation duration of sea turtle eggs is related to temperature, with eggs hatching quicker when the temperature is higher. Here we test this hypothesis by measuring thermal variations within loggerhead turtle nests and comparing these variations to the patterns of hatchling emergence.
几十年来,人们一直认为同一巢穴的海龟幼崽通常会一起从沙子里钻出。然而,对于在希腊凯法利尼亚岛筑巢的蠵龟(Caretta caretta),已经记录到一种更为不同步的钻出模式。通过在1998年将温度记录仪放置在凯法利尼亚岛上所筑巢穴的顶部和底部,我们研究了这种不同步钻出是否与巢穴内的热条件有关。显著的温度变化不仅存在于各个巢穴之间,也存在于单个巢穴内部。这些巢穴内的温度差异与幼崽钻出的模式有关,与温度较为均匀的巢穴相比,温度范围大的巢穴中的幼崽钻出的时间跨度更长。在许多产卵动物中,在卵孵化期间以及孵化之后,亲代对后代的照料可能会持续。因此,由于亲代自身可能会改变局部环境,巢穴位置对于确定孵化条件的重要性可能会降低。相比之下,对于海龟来说,一旦卵被产下并覆盖巢穴,亲代照料就停止了。因此,巢穴位置在空间和时间上的定位可能会对海龟产生深远影响,例如影响卵和幼崽的存活以及它们的性别(Janzen和Paukstis,1991)。在孵化期间,海龟胚胎从产卵时的几个细胞生长成为约50 - 80天后孵化时自给自足的生物体(Ackerman,1997)。孵化后,幼龟挖掘穿过沙子,通常在1 - 7个晚上后集体出现在表面,接下来的几个晚上会有一些掉队者出现(Christens,1990)。这与鸟类中经常观察到的孵化不同步模式形成对比。有人提出海龟集体钻出的原因是一窝卵在短时间内受精,然后,当巢穴内的热条件均匀时,以非常相似 的速度发育,因此一起孵化并钻出(Porter,1972)。作为这个观点的一个推论,可以预测当巢穴内存在显著的热梯度时,同胞幼龟的发育速度会不同,因此可能会出现不同步孵化和钻出。虽然幼龟集体钻出在能量方面可能是有益的(Carr和Hirth,1961),但如果孵化不同步的程度很明显,那么如果个体等待所有同胞孵化后才试图从沙子里挖出,可能会付出巨大代价(Hays和Speakman,1992)。在这种情况下,一小群幼龟在几个晚上内持续钻出可能会更有利。对文献的研究表明,钻出不同步可能比一般认为的更为普遍。例如,Witherington等人(1990)描述了佛罗里达州的蠵龟幼崽(Caretta caretta)在4天内钻出;对于绿海龟(Chelonia mydas),Hendrickson(1958)记录到马来西亚和沙捞越的巢穴产生幼崽的时间长达8天;而Diamond(1976)发现塞舌尔库辛岛上的玳瑁(Eretmochelys imbricata)巢穴活动长达4天。同样,在希腊凯法利尼亚岛,我们已经表明单个蠵龟巢穴的幼龟钻出可能会持续11个晚上(Hays和Speakman,1992)。合乎逻辑的推测是,不同步钻出与巢穴内的热梯度有关,因为海龟卵的孵化持续时间与温度有关——温度越高,卵孵化得越快。在这里,我们通过测量蠵龟巢穴内的热变化并将这些变化与幼龟钻出模式进行比较来检验这个假设。