Crist W M, Anderson J R, Meza J L, Fryer C, Raney R B, Ruymann F B, Breneman J, Qualman S J, Wiener E, Wharam M, Lobe T, Webber B, Maurer H M, Donaldson S S
Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study Group (IRSG) representing the Children's Cancer Group, the Pediatric Oncology Group, and the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Statistical Office, and the Quality Assurance Review Center, Arcadia, CA, USA.
J Clin Oncol. 2001 Jun 15;19(12):3091-102. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.12.3091.
The study goal was to improve outcome in children with rhabdomyosarcoma by comparing risk-based regimens of surgery, radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy.
Eight hundred eighty-three previously untreated eligible patients with nonmetastatic rhabdomyosarcoma entered the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study-IV (IRS-IV) (1991 to 1997) after surgery and were randomized treatment by primary tumor site, group (1 to 3), and stage (I to III). Failure-free survival (FFS) rates and survival were the end points used in comparisons between randomized groups and between patient subgroups treated on IRS-III and IRS-IV. Most patients were randomized to receive vincristine and dactinomycin (VA) and cyclophosphamide (VAC, n = 235), or VA and ifosfamide (VAI, n = 222), or vincristine, ifosfamide, and etoposide (VIE, n = 236). Patients with group 3 tumors were randomized to receive conventional RT (C-RT) versus hyperfractionated RT (HF-RT).
Overall 3-year FFS and survival were 77% and 86%, respectively. Three-year FFS rates with VAC, VAI, and VIE were 75%, 77%, and 77%, respectively (P =.42). No significant difference in outcome was noted with HF-RT versus C-RT (P =.85 and P =.90, respectively). Overall, patients with embryonal tumors benefited from intensive three-drug chemotherapy in IRS-IV (3-year FFS, 83%). The improvement was seen for patients with stage I or stage II/III, group 1/2 disease, many of whom received VA chemotherapy on IRS-III. Patients with stage 2/3, group 3 disease had similar outcomes on IRS-III and IRS-IV. Three-year FFS for the nonrandomized patient subsets was 75% with renal abnormalities; 81% for paratesticular, group 1 cases; and 91% for group 1/2 orbit or eyelid tumors. Patients with paratesticular primaries had poorer outcomes if they were more than 10 years old (3-year FFS, 63% v 90%). Myelosuppression occurred in most patients, but toxic deaths occurred in less than 1%.
VAC and VAI or VIE with surgery (with or without RT), are equally effective for patients with local or regional rhabdomyosarcoma and are more effective for embryonal tumors than therapies used previously. Younger patients with group 1 paratesticular embryonal tumors and all patients with group 1/2 orbit or eyelid tumors can usually be cured with VA chemotherapy along with postoperative RT for group 2 disease.
本研究的目标是通过比较基于风险的手术、放疗(RT)和化疗方案,改善横纹肌肉瘤患儿的治疗结果。
883例先前未接受过治疗的符合条件的非转移性横纹肌肉瘤患者在手术后进入横纹肌肉瘤协作组研究-IV(IRS-IV)(1991年至1997年),并根据原发肿瘤部位、分组(1至3组)和分期(I至III期)进行随机治疗。无病生存率(FFS)和总生存率是用于随机分组之间以及接受IRS-III和IRS-IV治疗的患者亚组之间比较的终点指标。大多数患者被随机分配接受长春新碱和放线菌素(VA)以及环磷酰胺(VAC,n = 235),或VA和异环磷酰胺(VAI,n = 222),或长春新碱、异环磷酰胺和依托泊苷(VIE,n = 236)。3组肿瘤患者被随机分配接受常规放疗(C-RT)与超分割放疗(HF-RT)。
总体3年FFS和总生存率分别为77%和86%。VAC、VAI和VIE的3年FFS率分别为75%、77%和77%(P = 0.42)。HF-RT与C-RT相比,治疗结果无显著差异(分别为P = 0.85和P = 0.90)。总体而言,胚胎型肿瘤患者在IRS-IV中受益于强化三联化疗(3年FFS,83%)。I期或II/III期、1/2组疾病的患者有改善,其中许多患者在IRS-III中接受了VA化疗。2/3期、3组疾病的患者在IRS-III和IRS-IV中的结果相似。非随机患者亚组的3年FFS,肾脏异常者为75%;睾丸旁1组病例为81%;1/2组眼眶或眼睑肿瘤为91%。睾丸旁原发肿瘤患者如果年龄超过10岁,预后较差(3年FFS,63%对90%)。大多数患者发生骨髓抑制,但毒性死亡发生率低于1%。
VAC和VAI或VIE联合手术(有或无放疗),对局部或区域性横纹肌肉瘤患者同样有效,并且对胚胎型肿瘤比以前使用的治疗方法更有效。年龄较小的1组睾丸旁胚胎型肿瘤患者和所有1/2组眼眶或眼睑肿瘤患者通常可以通过VA化疗联合2组疾病的术后放疗治愈。