Suppr超能文献

保存方法和β-葡聚糖酶添加对家禽大麦回肠氨基酸消化率及饲喂价值的影响

Effects of preservation method and beta-glucanase supplementation on ileal amino acid digestibility and feeding value of barley for poultry.

作者信息

Perttilä S, Valaja J, Partanen K, Jalava T, Kiiskinen T, Palander S

机构信息

Agricultural Research Centre of Finland, Jokioinen.

出版信息

Br Poult Sci. 2001 May;42(2):218-29. doi: 10.1080/00071660120048483.

Abstract
  1. Effects of preservation method (drying or air-tight storage of whole grain and ensiling of rolled high-moisture grain) and beta-glucanase supplementation (Econase) on apparent ileal amino acid digestibilities and metabolisable energy content of barley were evaluated with Ross broiler chickens. In addition, the effect of barley preservation method was assessed using Leghorn cockerels. 2. Birds were given either a semi-purified soyabean meal basal diet or a mixture of the basal diet and barley (50:50 on dry matter basis). Apparent ileal digestibilities (AID) of nutrients were assessed using the slaughter technique. AID of nutrients and nutrient digestibility measured using excreta (AED) were determined using chromium mordanted straw as an indigestible marker. 3. In broilers, AID of amino acids, dry matter and organic matter were lower for dried than air-tight stored barley, particularly for diets based on ensiled barley. In cockerels, barley preservation method had no effect on amino acid AID. The AED of nutrients and nitrogen corrected apparent metabolisable energy content (AMEn) was highest for ensiled barley across both experiments. 4. beta-glucanase supplementation increased nutrient digestibility, phosphorus retention and AMEn content of air-tight stored and dried barley diets in particular but had only negligible effects on ensiled barley. Beta-glucanase improved the AID of amino acids in dried barley but not in air-tight stored or ensiled barley. 5. Amino acid digestibilities were lower in broilers than cockerels and the effect of barley preservation on feeding value of barley was different for broilers and cockerels.
摘要
  1. 采用罗斯肉鸡评估了保存方法(全谷物干燥或气密储存以及高水分碾压谷物青贮)和添加β-葡聚糖酶(益康酶)对大麦表观回肠氨基酸消化率和代谢能含量的影响。此外,使用来亨公鸡评估了大麦保存方法的效果。2. 给鸡只饲喂半纯化豆粕基础日粮或基础日粮与大麦的混合物(干物质基础上为50:50)。采用屠宰技术评估养分的表观回肠消化率(AID)。使用铬媒染秸秆作为不可消化标记物测定养分的AID和用排泄物测定的养分消化率(AED)。3. 在肉鸡中,干燥大麦的氨基酸、干物质和有机物的AID低于气密储存的大麦,特别是基于青贮大麦的日粮。在公鸡中,大麦保存方法对氨基酸AID没有影响。在两个实验中,青贮大麦的养分AED和氮校正表观代谢能含量(AMEn)最高。4. 添加β-葡聚糖酶提高了养分消化率、磷保留率,特别是气密储存和干燥大麦日粮的AMEn含量,但对青贮大麦的影响微不足道。β-葡聚糖酶提高了干燥大麦中氨基酸的AID,但对气密储存或青贮大麦没有影响。5. 肉鸡的氨基酸消化率低于公鸡,并且大麦保存对大麦饲喂价值的影响在肉鸡和公鸡中有所不同。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验