Suppr超能文献

接受多巴酚丁胺与奈西立肽治疗的急性失代偿性充血性心力衰竭患者室性心律失常发生率的比较。

Comparison of the occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with acutely decompensated congestive heart failure receiving dobutamine versus nesiritide therapy.

作者信息

Burger A J, Elkayam U, Neibaur M T, Haught H, Ghali J, Horton D P, Aronson D

机构信息

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2001 Jul 1;88(1):35-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(01)01581-8.

Abstract

Ventricular arrhythmias are common in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) and may be exacerbated by positive inotropic therapy. Because human B-type natriuretic peptide (nesiritide), an arterial and venodilator, inhibits sympathetic activity, it may decrease the incidence of arrhythmias. Our investigation compares the arrhythmogenicity of dobutamine with nesiritide. A total of 305 patients with decompensated CHF requiring intravenous vasoactive therapy were randomized to receive standard therapy (n = 102) or nesiritide (0.015 microg/kg/min [n = 103] or 0.030 microg/kg/min [n = 100]) to gain additional data on the relative safety and efficacy of nesiritide compared with standard parenteral care. Dobutamine was chosen as the standard care agent in 58 subjects. During study drug infusion, all patients had continuous clinical hemodynamic and electrocardiographic monitoring. The dobutamine and nesiritide groups were similar with respect to baseline use of antiarrhythmic agents, including beta blockers. Serious arrhythmias and the incidence of cardiac arrest were more common in patients who received dobutamine than in those taking nesiritide: sustained ventricular tachycardia, 4 (7%) versus 2 (1%), respectively (p = 0.014); nonsustained ventricular tachycardia, 10 (17%) versus 23 (11%), respectively (p = 0.029); cardiac arrest, 3 (5%) versus 0, respectively (p = 0.011). We conclude that among patients with decompensated CHF for whom dobutamine is selected as standard therapy, the incidence of serious ventricular arrhythmias and cardiac arrest is significantly greater than the incidence of these events in patients randomized to nesiritide.

摘要

室性心律失常在充血性心力衰竭(CHF)患者中很常见,且可能因正性肌力治疗而加重。由于人B型利钠肽(奈西立肽)是一种动脉和静脉扩张剂,可抑制交感神经活动,因此可能降低心律失常的发生率。我们的研究比较了多巴酚丁胺和奈西立肽的致心律失常性。共有305例需要静脉血管活性治疗的失代偿性CHF患者被随机分组,分别接受标准治疗(n = 102)或奈西立肽(0.015微克/千克/分钟 [n = 103] 或0.030微克/千克/分钟 [n = 100]),以获取与标准肠外治疗相比,奈西立肽相对安全性和有效性的更多数据。58名受试者选择多巴酚丁胺作为标准治疗药物。在研究药物输注期间,所有患者均接受连续的临床血流动力学和心电图监测。多巴酚丁胺组和奈西立肽组在抗心律失常药物(包括β受体阻滞剂)的基线使用方面相似。接受多巴酚丁胺治疗的患者中,严重心律失常和心脏骤停的发生率比接受奈西立肽治疗的患者更常见:持续性室性心动过速分别为4例(7%)和2例(1%)(p = 0.014);非持续性室性心动过速分别为10例(17%)和23例(11%)(p = 0.029);心脏骤停分别为3例(5%)和0例(p = 0.011)。我们得出结论,在选择多巴酚丁胺作为标准治疗的失代偿性CHF患者中,严重室性心律失常和心脏骤停的发生率显著高于随机接受奈西立肽治疗的患者中这些事件的发生率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验