Speel E J, Scheidweiler A F, Zhao J, Matter C, Saremaslani P, Roth J, Heitz P U, Komminoth P
Department of Molecular Cell Biology, University of Maastricht, Research Institute Growth and Development, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Cancer Res. 2001 Jul 1;61(13):5186-92.
The malignant potential among endocrine pancreatic tumors (EPTs) varies greatly and can frequently not be predicted using histopathological parameters. Thus, molecular markers that can predict the biological behavior of EPTs are required. In a previous comparative genomic hybridization study, we observed marked genetic differences between the various EPT subtypes and a correlation between losses of 3p and 6 and gains of 14q and Xq and metastatic disease. To search for genetic alterations that play a role during early tumor development, we have studied 38 small (< or =2 cm) EPTs, including 24 insulinomas and 10 nonfunctioning EPTs. Small EPTs are usually classified as clinically benign tumors in the absence of histological signs of malignancy. Using comparative genomic hybridization, we identified chromosomal aberrations in 27 EPTs (mean, 4.1). Interestingly, the number of gains differed strongly between nonfunctioning and functioning EPTs (3.4 versus 1.5, respectively; P = 0.0526), as did the number of aberrations in the benign (n = 30) and malignant (n = 8) tumors (3 versus 8.4, respectively; P = 0.0022). In the insulinomas, 9q gain (common region of involvement: 9q34) was most common (50%) and in nonfunctioning EPTs, gain of 4p was most common (40%). Most frequent losses in insulinomas involved 1p (20.8%), 1q, 4q, 11q, Xq, and Y (all 16.7%) and in nonfunctioning EPTs, 6q. Losses of 3pq and 6q and gains of 17pq and 20q proved to be strongly associated with malignant behavior in all of the small EPTs (P < or = 0.0219). Our results demonstrate marked genetic differences between small functioning and nonfunctioning EPTs, indicating that these subtypes evolve along different genetic pathways. In addition, our study endorses the importance of chromosomes 3 and 6q losses to discriminate EPTs with a malignant behavior from benign ones.
内分泌胰腺肿瘤(EPTs)的恶性潜能差异很大,通常无法使用组织病理学参数进行预测。因此,需要能够预测EPTs生物学行为的分子标志物。在先前的比较基因组杂交研究中,我们观察到不同EPT亚型之间存在明显的基因差异,以及3p和6号染色体缺失与14q和Xq增益与转移性疾病之间的相关性。为了寻找在肿瘤早期发展过程中起作用的基因改变,我们研究了38个小(≤2 cm)EPTs,包括24个胰岛素瘤和10个无功能性EPTs。小EPTs在没有恶性组织学迹象的情况下通常被归类为临床良性肿瘤。使用比较基因组杂交,我们在27个EPTs中鉴定出染色体畸变(平均4.1个)。有趣的是,无功能性和功能性EPTs的增益数量差异很大(分别为3.4和1.5;P = 0.0526),良性(n = 30)和恶性(n = 8)肿瘤的畸变数量也是如此(分别为3和8.4;P = 0.0022)。在胰岛素瘤中,9q增益(常见受累区域:9q34)最为常见(50%),在无功能性EPTs中,4p增益最为常见(40%)。胰岛素瘤中最常见的缺失涉及1p(20.8%)、1q、4q、11q、Xq和Y(均为16.7%),在无功能性EPTs中为6q。在所有小EPTs中,3pq和6q缺失以及17pq和20q增益与恶性行为密切相关(P≤0.0219)。我们的结果表明,小的功能性和无功能性EPTs之间存在明显的基因差异,表明这些亚型沿着不同的基因途径发展。此外,我们的研究支持3号染色体和6q缺失对于区分具有恶性行为的EPTs和良性EPTs的重要性。