Suppr超能文献

医院糖尿病专科护理服务评估:一项随机对照试验。

Evaluation of a hospital diabetes specialist nursing service: a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Davies M, Dixon S, Currie C J, Davis R E, Peters J R

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff, Wales, UK.

出版信息

Diabet Med. 2001 Apr;18(4):301-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-5491.2001.00470.x.

Abstract

AIMS

To evaluate the effectiveness and cost implications of a hospital diabetes specialist nursing service.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective, open, randomized, controlled trial of standard in-patient care for adults with diabetes, with and without the intervention of a diabetes specialist nursing (DSN) service. The setting was a single UK university hospital.

SUBJECTS

were unselected patients referred to the hospital DSN service. Primary outcome measures were length of hospital stay and patterns of readmission (frequency and time to first readmission). Secondary outcome measures were subjects' diabetes-related quality of life, diabetes knowledge score, satisfaction with treatment, and GP and community care contacts following discharge. Costs were estimated from the hospital and published sources.

RESULTS

Median length of stay was lower in the intervention group (11.0 vs. 8.0 days, P < 0.01). Readmission rates were the same in the two groups (25%), and mean time to readmission was similar in the two groups, although slightly less in the control group (278 vs. 283 days, P = 0.80). The cost per patient for nursing input was 38.94 pounds sterling. However, when the reduced length of stay was accounted for, the intervention produced a mean cost per admission of 436 ponds sterling lower than that of the control group (P = 0.19). Patients in the intervention group were more knowledgeable regarding their diabetes and more satisfied with their care.

CONCLUSIONS

Diabetes specialist nurses are potentially cost saving by reducing hospital length of stay (LOS). There was no evidence of an adverse effect of reduced LOS on re-admissions, use of community resources, or patient perception of quality of care.

摘要

目的

评估医院糖尿病专科护理服务的有效性及成本影响。

方法

我们对患有糖尿病的成年住院患者进行了一项前瞻性、开放性、随机对照试验,比较有或无糖尿病专科护理(DSN)服务干预的标准住院治疗。研究地点为英国一家大学医院。

研究对象

为转诊至医院DSN服务的未经过筛选的患者。主要结局指标为住院时间和再入院模式(频率及首次再入院时间)。次要结局指标为受试者与糖尿病相关的生活质量、糖尿病知识得分、对治疗的满意度以及出院后与全科医生(GP)和社区护理的联系情况。成本从医院及已发表的资料中估算得出。

结果

干预组的中位住院时间较短(11.0天对8.0天,P < 0.01)。两组的再入院率相同(25%),两组的平均再入院时间相似,尽管对照组略短(278天对283天,P = 0.80)。每位患者的护理投入成本为38.94英镑。然而,考虑到住院时间的缩短,干预组每次入院的平均成本比对照组低436英镑(P = 0.19)。干预组的患者对糖尿病知识了解更多,对护理更满意。

结论

糖尿病专科护士有可能通过缩短住院时间来节省成本。没有证据表明住院时间缩短会对再次入院、社区资源利用或患者对护理质量的认知产生不利影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验