Magné N, Marcy P Y, Chamorey E, Guardiola E, Pivot X, Schneider M, Demard F, Bensadoun R J
Department of Head and Neck Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, 33 Avenue de Valombrose, 06189 Nice cedex 2, France.
Head Neck. 2001 Aug;23(8):678-82. doi: 10.1002/hed.1095.
The purpose of this study is to make a comparative analysis between acute toxicity with late toxicity. This study is based upon a French quality of life (QoL) questionnaire in a cohort of advanced head and neck (H&N) cancer patients treated by concomitant twice-a-day continuous radiotherapy with no acceleration and chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil.
From September 1992 to November 1997, a prospective data bank of 91 patients was constituted. In November 1999, 31 patients were still alive and followed for more than 3 years. All patients had stage IV strictly unresectable squamous cell carcinoma of oropharynx or hypopharynx. A French specific H&N cancer QoL questionnaire was used at the end of radiotherapy and at the last date of follow-up of each patient (during 1999). p values reflect comparison of percentages obtained at the end of treatment with percentages at long-term follow-up. Statistical analysis was performed using chi(2) test (p <.05 considered as significant). Percentages obtained by the QoL questionnaire correspond to moderate-severe problems only.
Twenty-nine of 31 (94%) patients participated in the QoL study. Acute treatment toxicities were severe with declines in virtually all QoL and functional domains. Globally, with an average long-term follow-up of 4.5 years (range 3-7 years after treatment), there is a statistical improvement in the following symptoms: dry mouth and sticky saliva (97% versus 55%, p <.05); tasting problems (35% versus 21%, not significant); swallowing problems (77% versus 36%, p <.05); and H&N pain (86% versus 9%, p <.05). Financial problems were not improved (21% versus 14%, not significant), and psychological problems (59% versus 5%) were statistically significant. Fourteen of 29 (48%) patients were drinking and 8 of 29 (28%) were smoking at long-term follow-up; at the diagnosis they were 86% and 90%, respectively. At long-term follow-up 22 of 29 presented good or very good QoL, and 25 of 29 said they had improved their initial QoL.
The interest of twice-a-day radiotherapy with concomitant chemotherapy is to increase total radiotherapy equivalent dose without increasing late toxicity and also to improve locoregional control, survival, and long-term QoL/effectiveness ratio. Best supportive care is recommended to obtain both good QoL and cancer control in a long-term follow-up.
本研究旨在对急性毒性和晚期毒性进行对比分析。本研究基于一份法国生活质量(QoL)问卷,该问卷针对一组接受每日两次连续放疗(无加速)联合顺铂和5-氟尿嘧啶化疗的晚期头颈部(H&N)癌症患者。
从1992年9月至1997年11月,建立了一个包含91例患者的前瞻性数据库。1999年11月,31例患者仍存活且随访时间超过3年。所有患者均患有IV期严格不可切除的口咽或下咽鳞状细胞癌。在放疗结束时以及每位患者(1999年期间)的最后随访日期使用了一份法国特定的H&N癌症QoL问卷。p值反映治疗结束时获得的百分比与长期随访时百分比的比较。使用卡方检验进行统计分析(p <.05被视为具有统计学意义)。QoL问卷获得的百分比仅对应中度至重度问题。
31例患者中有29例(94%)参与了QoL研究。急性治疗毒性严重,几乎所有QoL和功能领域均下降。总体而言,平均长期随访4.5年(治疗后3 - 7年),以下症状有统计学改善:口干和唾液黏稠(97%对55%,p <.05);味觉问题(35%对21%,无统计学意义);吞咽问题(77%对36%,p <.05);以及H&N疼痛(86%对9%,p <.05)。经济问题未改善(21%对14%,无统计学意义),心理问题(59%对5%)有统计学意义。长期随访时,29例患者中有14例(48%)饮酒,8例(28%)吸烟;诊断时分别为86%和90%。长期随访时,29例中有22例生活质量良好或非常好,29例中有25例表示其初始生活质量有所改善。
每日两次放疗联合化疗的意义在于在不增加晚期毒性的情况下增加总放疗等效剂量,同时改善局部区域控制、生存率以及长期生活质量/有效性比值。建议采用最佳支持性护理,以便在长期随访中获得良好的生活质量和癌症控制效果。