Roux C, Roberjot V, Porcher R, Kolta S, Dougados M, Laugier P
Département de Rhumatologie, Hĵpital Cochin, Université René Descartes, Paris, France.
J Bone Miner Res. 2001 Jul;16(7):1353-62. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.7.1353.
Ultrasound technology has emerged as a new tool in the assessment of osteoporosis. Ultrasound parameters usually are measured in transmission; there is a potential for the analysis of backscattered signals to provide information on bone microarchitecture. The aim of this study was to explore a new technological development of the method, adding backscatter coefficient to transmission parameters, and to examine the appropriate thresholds to identify postmenopausal osteoporotic women. We examined 210 postmenopausal women (including 60 with osteoporotic fractures) and 30 healthy premenopausal controls. They had lumbar spine and hip bone mineral density (BMD) measurement and quantitative ultrasound (QUS) evaluation at the os calcis, measured in transmission (broadband ultrasound attenuation [BUA], speed of sound [SOS], ratio of transit time [dt] to BUA [dt/BUA], and "strength" index [STI]) and reflexion (broadband ultrasound backscattering [BUB]). The standardized CVs (sCVs) were between 2.27 % and 3.40 % for QUS measured in transmission and 4.41% for BUB. The odds ratio (OR) for fracture discrimination adjusted for age was 2.77 for hip BMD and between 1.6 and 2.9 for QUS. After adjustment for hip BMD, ORs were still highly significant for SOS, STI, and dt/BUA. According to hip BMD T score, prevalence of osteoporosis in our population was 39%. To detect the same prevalence, T scores ranged between -0.95 and -1.42 for QUS. QUS parameters have adequate ability to discriminate osteoporotic patients from controls. The World Health Organization (WHO) threshold for diagnosis of osteoporosis does not apply to this technology. The clinical utility of BUB at the os calcis, in addition to usual ultrasound parameters, is not yet proven. However, BUB evaluation, which does not require two transducers and may be implemented in conventional reflection mode systems, warrants further studies.
超声技术已成为评估骨质疏松症的一种新工具。超声参数通常在透射模式下测量;分析反向散射信号有可能提供有关骨微结构的信息。本研究的目的是探索该方法的一项新技术发展,将背散射系数添加到透射参数中,并检查用于识别绝经后骨质疏松症女性的合适阈值。我们检查了210名绝经后女性(包括60名有骨质疏松性骨折的女性)和30名健康的绝经前对照者。她们进行了腰椎和髋部骨密度(BMD)测量以及跟骨定量超声(QUS)评估,在透射模式下测量(宽带超声衰减[BUA]、声速[SOS]、渡越时间[dt]与BUA的比值[dt/BUA]以及“强度”指数[STI])和反射模式下测量(宽带超声背散射[BUB])。透射模式下测量的QUS的标准化变异系数(sCVs)在2.27%至3.40%之间,BUB的标准化变异系数为4.41%。经年龄调整后的骨折判别比值比(OR),髋部BMD为2.77,QUS为1.6至2.9。在调整髋部BMD后,SOS、STI和dt/BUA的OR仍然具有高度显著性。根据髋部BMD T值,我们研究人群中骨质疏松症的患病率为39%。为检测相同的患病率,QUS的T值范围在 -0.95至 -1.42之间。QUS参数有足够的能力区分骨质疏松症患者和对照者。世界卫生组织(WHO)的骨质疏松症诊断阈值不适用于该技术。跟骨处BUB除常规超声参数外的临床效用尚未得到证实。然而,BUB评估不需要两个换能器,并且可以在传统反射模式系统中实施,值得进一步研究。