The deplorable state of the description of the use of certified reference materials in the literature.

A detailed survey of 26 scientific journals showed that journal editors and a majority of authors of the re- c viewed papers seem unconcerned by the importance of correctly reporting their use of certified reference materials (CRMs). Only around 55% of the abstracts surveyed mention the use of CRMs described in these papers. This, however, is of key importance as the abstract of a paper is most widely available in electronic media. Many authors mentioned the use of CRMs in passing, often in incomplete form and without giving any details of the results obtained. Some are confused about the source of the reference material used, as they fail to report the type or the producer of CRMs applied. Others use materials that do not match the samples analyzed or do not see the need to use any CRM, despite the availability of suitable materials. Even in cases where correct data were given for type and producer of the CRMs, frequently the proper use and statistical evaluation are questionable. To improve this situation it is necessary that publishers should give recommendations where and how the use of CRMs should be described.