Santoni-Rugiu F, Verma R, Mehta D, Gopal A, Chan E K, Pe E, Gomes J A
Electrophysiology Section of the Zena and Micheal Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Department of Medicine, The Mount Sinai Medical Center and The Mount Sinai School of Medicine of NYU, New York, NY 10029, USA.
J Electrocardiol. 2001 Jul;34(3):189-95. doi: 10.1054/jelc.2001.25133.
Atrial fibrillation (Afib) has been associated with abnormal signal-averaged P wave (SAPW) parameters but whether SAPW is associated with the time course of these arrhythmias (persistent vs. paroxysmal, frequent vs. rare episodes) remains unknown. This article assesses the significance of SAPW duration in distinguishing patients with paroxysmal from those with persistent Afib. SAPW electrocardiogram was performed with a "double triggering" software system for acquisition and analysis of data. SAPW total duration (TD), X, Y, and Z leads magnitudes and vector signal magnitudes were measured offline. Optimal cutoff value between control and patient groups was determined by using a receiver operator characteristic curve. Data were analyzed to compare controls with patients groups and between patient groups according to time course of the arrhythmic history. Fifteen age-matched patients without a history of Afib and 55 patients with a history of Afib (33 with paroxysmal and 22 with persistent arrhythmia) were studied off antiarrhythmic drugs. Patients with history of persistent arrhythmia were studied within 2 days after electrical cardioversion to sinus rhythm. SAPW TD was the only parameter consistently associated with Afib. SAPW TD was 98 +/- 6 ms (mean +/- SD) in the control group, 127 +/- 19 ms in the pooled patients group (P =.0001); 122 +/- 20 ms for paroxysmal and 133 +/- 17 ms for the persistent Afib group (P =.04). Analysis of other SAPW parameters were not statistically significant. SAPW duration is a simple method to identify patients with history of Afib. A significantly longer SAPW TD characterizes patients with a history of persistent as opposed to paroxysmal Afib. Prolongation of SAPW TD possibly reflects more advanced electrophysiological changes, creating a more stable substrate that leads to persistence of the arrhythmia.
心房颤动(房颤)与异常信号平均P波(SAPW)参数有关,但SAPW是否与这些心律失常的病程(持续性与阵发性、频发与偶发发作)相关仍不清楚。本文评估了SAPW持续时间在区分阵发性房颤患者与持续性房颤患者中的意义。使用“双触发”软件系统进行SAPW心电图检查以采集和分析数据。离线测量SAPW总持续时间(TD)、X、Y和Z导联幅度以及向量信号幅度。通过使用受试者工作特征曲线确定对照组和患者组之间的最佳截断值。根据心律失常病史的病程分析数据,以比较对照组与患者组以及患者组之间的情况。研究了15名无房颤病史且年龄匹配的患者以及55名有房颤病史的患者(33例阵发性房颤和22例持续性心律失常),均未服用抗心律失常药物。有持续性心律失常病史的患者在电复律转为窦性心律后2天内进行研究。SAPW TD是唯一与房颤始终相关的参数。对照组的SAPW TD为98±6毫秒(平均值±标准差),合并患者组为127±19毫秒(P = 0.0001);阵发性房颤组为122±20毫秒,持续性房颤组为133±17毫秒(P = 0.04)。对其他SAPW参数的分析无统计学意义。SAPW持续时间是识别有房颤病史患者的一种简单方法。与阵发性房颤患者相比,持续性房颤病史患者的SAPW TD明显更长。SAPW TD延长可能反映了更晚期的电生理变化,形成了一个更稳定的基质,导致心律失常持续存在。