Yeboah F K, Yaylayan V A
Biotechnology Research Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Nahrung. 2001 Jun;45(3):164-71. doi: 10.1002/1521-3803(20010601)45:3<164::AID-FOOD164>3.0.CO;2-Q.
The analysis of protein glycation poses a difficult challenge due to the complex nature of the reaction. Of the several methods developed for the qualitative and quantitative evaluation of the glycation reaction between proteins and reducing sugars, soft ionization mass spectrometry is the most direct and reliable. In this paper we review the major mass spectrometric methods (ESI and MALDI mass spectrometry) used in the study of protein glycation. We also tested the assumption that limited glycation has little or no effect on the ionization potential of proteins and that the distribution profile of molecular ion peaks of different glycoforms in a mass spectrum reflect their solution composition in a mixture. The results confirm the validity of the above assumption under dilute solution conditions (0.2-0.6 g/ml total protein). A comparison of ESI and MALDI mass spectrometry in the analysis of protein glycation showed that both methods provide qualitative and quantitative analytical results, but the choice of instrument depends on the nature of the sample to be analysed, the level of accuracy and the type of information that is required.
由于蛋白质糖基化反应的复杂性,对其进行分析是一项艰巨的挑战。在为定性和定量评估蛋白质与还原糖之间的糖基化反应而开发的几种方法中,软电离质谱法是最直接、最可靠的。在本文中,我们综述了用于蛋白质糖基化研究的主要质谱方法(电喷雾电离质谱和基质辅助激光解吸电离质谱)。我们还验证了以下假设:有限的糖基化对蛋白质的电离电位几乎没有影响,并且质谱中不同糖型的分子离子峰分布轮廓反映了它们在混合物中的溶液组成。结果证实了上述假设在稀溶液条件下(总蛋白浓度为0.2 - 0.6 g/ml)的有效性。对电喷雾电离质谱和基质辅助激光解吸电离质谱在蛋白质糖基化分析中的比较表明,两种方法都能提供定性和定量分析结果,但仪器的选择取决于待分析样品的性质、所需的准确度水平和信息类型。