Suppr超能文献

冠状动脉搭桥术后的胸部物理治疗——三种不同深呼吸技术的比较

Chest physiotherapy after coronary artery bypass graft surgery--a comparison of three different deep breathing techniques.

作者信息

Westerdahl E, Lindmark B, Almgren S O, Tenling A

机构信息

Department of Physiotherapy, Orebro Medical Centre Hospital, Sweden.

出版信息

J Rehabil Med. 2001 Mar;33(2):79-84. doi: 10.1080/165019701750098920.

Abstract

The effectiveness of three deep breathing techniques was evaluated in 98 male patients after coronary artery bypass graft surgery in a randomized trial. The techniques examined were deep breathing with a blow bottle-device, an inspiratory resistance-positive expiratory pressure mask (IR-PEP) and performed with no mechanical device. Pulmonary function and roentgenological changes were evaluated. Four days post-operatively there were significantly decreased vital capacity, inspiratory capacity, forced expiratory volume in 1 second, functional residual capacity, total lung capacity and single-breath carbon monoxide diffusing capacity in all three groups (p < 0.0001). No major differences between the treatment groups were found, but the impairment in pulmonary function tended to be less marked using the blow bottle technique. The Blow bottle group had significantly less reduction in total lung capacity (p = 0.01) compared to the Deep breathing group, while the IR-PEP group did not significantly differ from the other two groups.

摘要

在一项随机试验中,对98名冠状动脉搭桥手术后的男性患者评估了三种深呼吸技术的有效性。所检查的技术包括使用吹瓶装置进行深呼吸、使用吸气阻力-呼气末正压面罩(IR-PEP)进行深呼吸以及不使用机械设备进行深呼吸。对肺功能和影像学变化进行了评估。术后四天,所有三组的肺活量、吸气量、一秒用力呼气量、功能残气量、肺总量和单次呼吸一氧化碳弥散量均显著下降(p < 0.0001)。各治疗组之间未发现重大差异,但使用吹瓶技术时肺功能损害往往不太明显。与深呼吸组相比,吹瓶组的肺总量减少明显更少(p = 0.01),而IR-PEP组与其他两组无显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验