Gamber R G, Gish E E, Herron K M
Department of Manipulative Medicine, University of North Texas Health Science Center at Fort Worth, 3500 Camp Bowie Boulevard, Fort Worth, TX 76107, USA.
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2001 Jul;101(7):395-400. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2001.101.7.395.
Recent studies have demonstrated a decline in the use of osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) by osteopathic physicians, reflecting a trend that may begin in medical school. The authors used a questionnaire to examine the teaching and use of OMT in five rotations and the perceptions of 86 graduating osteopathic medical students of their experiences following their core manipulative medicine rotation. Most students indicated that they applied osteopathic principles sometimes (39.5%) or often (29.1%) during rotations. Forty-three percent of students rated their ability to apply osteopathic principles as average. The number of students who indicated that they rarely used OMT during their rotations was 31 (36.0%) for internal medicine, 21 (24.4%) for surgery, 23 (26.7%) for pediatrics, and 24 (27.9%) for obstetrics/gynecology. When asked why OMT was not used during a rotation, 47.2% of respondents cited time constraints, and 21.7% stated that their attending physicians discouraged the use of OMT. These results demonstrate a distinction between students' perceived level of osteopathic principles and skills and their application during clinical rotations.
最近的研究表明,整骨疗法医生对整骨手法治疗(OMT)的使用有所减少,这反映出一种可能始于医学院的趋势。作者使用问卷调查了五个轮转科室中OMT的教学与使用情况,以及86名即将毕业的整骨医学专业学生对核心手法医学轮转后的经历的看法。大多数学生表示,他们在轮转期间有时(39.5%)或经常(29.1%)应用整骨疗法原则。43%的学生将自己应用整骨疗法原则的能力评为中等。在内科轮转期间表示很少使用OMT的学生有31人(36.0%),外科为21人(24.4%),儿科为23人(26.7%),妇产科为24人(27.9%)。当被问及在轮转期间为何不使用OMT时,47.2%的受访者提到时间限制,21.7%的人表示他们的主治医生不鼓励使用OMT。这些结果表明,学生对整骨疗法原则和技能的认知水平与他们在临床轮转期间的应用情况存在差异。