Suppr超能文献

利培酮与氟哌啶醇治疗分裂情感性障碍疗效及安全性的双盲、随机、前瞻性评估

A double-blind, randomized, prospective evaluation of the efficacy and safety of risperidone versus haloperidol in the treatment of schizoaffective disorder.

作者信息

Janicak P G, Keck P E, Davis J M, Kasckow J W, Tugrul K, Dowd S M, Strong J, Sharma R P, Strakowski S M

机构信息

The Psychiatric Clinical Research Center and Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, 60612, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2001 Aug;21(4):360-8. doi: 10.1097/00004714-200108000-00002.

Abstract

The relative efficacy and safety of risperidone versus haloperidol in the treatment of schizoaffective disorder was studied. Sixty-two patients (29 depressed type; 33 bipolar type) entered a three-site, randomized, double-blind, 6-week trial of risperidone (up to 10 mg/day) or haloperidol (up to 20 mg/day). Trained raters assessed baseline, weekly, and end-of-study levels of psychopathology with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), the 24-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D-24) and the Clinician-Administered Rating Scale for Mania (CARS-M). The authors were unable to statistically distinguish between risperidone and haloperidol in the amelioration of psychotic and manic symptoms. In addition, there was no difference in worsening of mania between the two agents in either subgroup (i.e., depressed or bipolar subgroups). For the total PANSS, risperidone produced a mean decrease of 16 points from baseline compared with a 14-point decrease with haloperidol. For the total CARS-M scale, risperidone and haloperidol produced mean change scores of 5 and 8 points, respectively, and for the CARS-M Mania subscale, 3 and 7 points, respectively. Additionally, risperidone produced a mean decrease of 13 points from the baseline 24-item HAM-D, compared with an 8-point decrease with haloperidol. In those patients who had more severe depressive symptoms (i.e., HAM-D baseline score >20), risperidone produced at least a 50% mean improvement in 12 (75%) of 16 patients in comparison to 8 (38%) of 21 patients receiving haloperidol. Haloperidol produced significantly more extrapyramidal side effects and resulted in more dropouts caused by any side effect. There was no difference between risperidone and haloperidol in reducing both psychotic and manic symptoms in this group of patients with schizoaffective disorder. Risperidone did not demonstrate a propensity to precipitate mania and was better tolerated than haloperidol. In those subjects with higher baseline HAM-D scores (i.e., >20), risperidone produced a greater improvement in depressive symptoms than haloperidol.

摘要

研究了利培酮与氟哌啶醇治疗分裂情感性障碍的相对疗效和安全性。62例患者(29例抑郁型;33例双相型)进入一项为期6周的三中心、随机、双盲试验,接受利培酮(最大剂量10mg/天)或氟哌啶醇(最大剂量20mg/天)治疗。训练有素的评估者使用阳性和阴性症状量表(PANSS)、24项汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(HAM-D-24)和临床医生评定的躁狂量表(CARS-M)评估基线、每周和研究结束时的精神病理学水平。作者无法在改善精神病性和躁狂症状方面在统计学上区分利培酮和氟哌啶醇。此外,在两个亚组(即抑郁或双相亚组)中,两种药物在躁狂恶化方面没有差异。对于PANSS总分,利培酮与基线相比平均下降16分,而氟哌啶醇下降14分。对于CARS-M总分,利培酮和氟哌啶醇的平均变化分数分别为5分和8分,对于CARS-M躁狂子量表,分别为3分和7分。此外,与氟哌啶醇下降8分相比,利培酮与基线24项HAM-D相比平均下降13分。在那些有更严重抑郁症状的患者(即HAM-D基线评分>20)中,与接受氟哌啶醇的21例患者中的8例(38%)相比,利培酮使16例患者中的12例(75%)平均改善至少50%。氟哌啶醇产生的锥体外系副作用明显更多,并且因任何副作用导致的退出研究的情况更多。在这组分裂情感性障碍患者中,利培酮和氟哌啶醇在减轻精神病性和躁狂症状方面没有差异。利培酮没有诱发躁狂的倾向,并且耐受性比氟哌啶醇更好。在那些基线HAM-D评分较高(即>20)的受试者中,利培酮在改善抑郁症状方面比氟哌啶醇更有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验