Kim J C
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Chungnam National University Hospital, 640 Daesa-dong, Jung-gu, Taejon, 301-721, South Korea.
Clin Imaging. 2001 Mar-Apr;25(2):122-5. doi: 10.1016/s0899-7071(01)00259-5.
To compare how often the central lucency of pelvic phleboliths is seen on plain radiographs and noncontrast helical computed tomography (CT), both images in 70 patients with renal colic were analyzed. Both images revealed the same number of phleboliths in all cases except one in which one of two phleboliths demonstrated by CT was not seen on radiographs. Radiography revealed central lucency in 95 of 149 pelvic phleboliths (63%), but CT failed to depict a hypodense center in any of 150 phleboliths. The presence or absence of central lucency on CT images cannot, therefore, be used to differentiate phleboliths from distal ureteral calculi.
为比较盆腔静脉石的中心透亮区在平片和非增强螺旋计算机断层扫描(CT)上的显示频率,对70例肾绞痛患者的这两种影像进行了分析。除1例患者外,所有病例的两种影像显示的静脉石数量相同,该例患者中CT显示的两个静脉石之一在平片上未显示。平片显示149个盆腔静脉石中有95个(63%)存在中心透亮区,但CT在150个静脉石中均未显示低密度中心。因此,CT图像上中心透亮区的有无不能用于鉴别静脉石和远端输尿管结石。