Raphael D, Brown I, Bryant T, Wheeler J, Herman R, Houston J, Hussain M, Lanphier C, Lightfoot B, McClelland B, McIntosh B, Stevens I, Weisbeck F
School of Health Policy and Management, Atkinson Faculty of Liberal and Professional Studies, York University, Toronto, ON.
Can J Public Health. 2001 May-Jun;92(3):190-5. doi: 10.1007/BF03404303.
Toronto seniors explored how government policy decisions were influencing their health and well-being. In this participatory policy study, emphasis was upon the lay and critical knowledge of highly informed seniors. Focus groups and interviews revealed that all three levels of governments were seen as not listening to seniors' voices. In nine key policy areas identified as influencing seniors' quality of life--hearing seniors' voices, housing, acute illness care, long-term care, income supports, transportation and mobility, promoting healthy lifestyles, access to information, and hearing voices from cultural communities--many concerns were raised. The gap between government rhetoric and government action on seniors' issues merits public health attention.
多伦多的老年人探讨了政府政策决策如何影响他们的健康和福祉。在这项参与式政策研究中,重点是知识渊博的老年人的外行知识和批判性知识。焦点小组和访谈显示,三级政府都被认为没有听取老年人的声音。在被确定为影响老年人生活质量的九个关键政策领域——听取老年人的声音、住房、急性病护理、长期护理、收入支持、交通与出行、促进健康生活方式、信息获取以及听取文化社区的声音——人们提出了许多关切。政府在老年人问题上的言辞与行动之间的差距值得公共卫生关注。