Suppr超能文献

美国糖尿病协会定义的糖尿病及其他类型血糖失调在老年人中的患病率及其临床意义:健康、衰老与身体成分研究

Prevalence and clinical implications of American Diabetes Association-defined diabetes and other categories of glucose dysregulation in older adults: the health, aging and body composition study.

作者信息

Resnick H E, Shorr R I, Kuller L, Franse L, Harris T B

机构信息

MedStar Research Institute, 108 Irving Street, NW, Washington, DC 20010-2933, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2001 Sep;54(9):869-76. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(01)00359-6.

Abstract

Using data on history of diabetes, fasting glucose (FG) and the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), the authors contrasted cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors (body mass index, blood pressure, lipids and glycated hemoglobin) in 3052 African-American and White adults aged 70-79 in mutually exclusive categories of diagnosed diabetes, undiagnosed diabetes defined by the American Diabetes Association (ADA), isolated post-challenge hyperglycemia (IPH; FG < 126 mg/dL and 2 h post-OGTT > or = 200 mg/dL), impaired fasting glucose (IFG; FG > or = 110 but < 126 mg/dL), and individuals who were non-diabetic by both ADA and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria (FG < 126 mg/dL and 2 h post-challenge glucose < 200 mg/dL). The prevalence of diagnosed diabetes, undiagnosed ADA diabetes and IPH were 15.2, 3.8 and 4.7%, respectively, with more diagnosed and undiagnosed ADA diabetes in African-Americans than Whites. Compared to mean glycated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) among ADA/WHO non-diabetic individuals (6.0%), HbA(1c) was substantially higher in the diagnosed diabetes and undiagnosed ADA diabetes groups (8.0% and 7.7%), but not in the IPH group (6.3%). The diagnosed and undiagnosed ADA diabetic groups had worse CVD risk factor profiles than the ADA/WHO non-diabetic group. IPH subjects had elevated levels of some CVD risk factors, but differences were more modest than those for the diabetic groups. Among people with IPH, those who also had IFG had worse CVD profiles than those with IPH alone. Although the OGTT may identify additional adults with more CVD risk factors than normals, these differences appear to be clustered among those who also have IFG.

摘要

利用糖尿病病史、空腹血糖(FG)及口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)的数据,作者对比了3052名年龄在70至79岁之间的非裔美国人和白人成年人在相互排斥的糖尿病诊断类别中的心血管疾病(CVD)危险因素(体重指数、血压、血脂和糖化血红蛋白),这些类别包括已诊断糖尿病、美国糖尿病协会(ADA)定义的未诊断糖尿病、单纯餐后高血糖(IPH;FG<126mg/dL且OGTT后2小时血糖≥200mg/dL)、空腹血糖受损(IFG;FG≥110但<126mg/dL)以及根据ADA和世界卫生组织(WHO)标准均无糖尿病的个体(FG<126mg/dL且餐后2小时血糖<200mg/dL)。已诊断糖尿病、未诊断的ADA糖尿病和IPH的患病率分别为15.2%、3.8%和4.7%,非裔美国人中已诊断和未诊断的ADA糖尿病患者比白人更多。与ADA/WHO非糖尿病个体的平均糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)(6.0%)相比,已诊断糖尿病组和未诊断的ADA糖尿病组的HbA1c显著更高(8.0%和7.7%),但IPH组(6.3%)并非如此。已诊断和未诊断的ADA糖尿病组的CVD危险因素状况比ADA/WHO非糖尿病组更差。IPH受试者的一些CVD危险因素水平升高,但差异比糖尿病组更为适度。在患有IPH的人群中,同时患有IFG的人比单纯患有IPH的人CVD状况更差。尽管OGTT可能会识别出比正常人有更多CVD危险因素的其他成年人,但这些差异似乎集中在那些同时患有IFG的人当中。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验