Wang A Y, Lai F M, Yu A W, Lam P K, Chow K M, Choi P C, Lui S F, Li P K
Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Center of Clinical Trial and Epidemiological Research, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, The Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong.
Am J Kidney Dis. 2001 Sep;38(3):588-96. doi: 10.1053/ajkd.2001.26885.
Previous reports of renal transplantation for patients with underlying immunoglobulin A (IgA) nephropathy suggested a recurrence rate greater than 50% for transplant IgA nephropathy. Initially regarded as a benign condition, more recent data showed that recurrent transplant IgA nephropathy may be a significant contributor to graft loss. We performed a retrospective analysis in a single center of 48 kidney transplant recipients, all of Chinese origin, with biopsy-proven IgA nephropathy as the cause of end-stage renal failure to determine the recurrence rate of IgA nephropathy in the transplant allograft and subsequent clinical course in Chinese patients. Median duration of follow-up was 52 months (range, 18 to 155 months). Fourteen patients (29%) had biopsy-confirmed recurrent transplant IgA nephropathy after a median of 52 months (interquartile range, 23 to 82 months) posttransplantation. Recurrent transplant IgA nephropathy was associated with greater serum IgA levels (P = 0.01). The presence of HLA-A2 in transplant recipients (P = 0.002) appeared to protect them from developing recurrent IgA nephropathy in the transplant allograft. Twenty-nine percent of patients with recurrent transplant IgA nephropathy had progressive deterioration of graft function. The progressive graft dysfunction (GD) rate was greater in patients with a transplant from a living related donor (LRD; 21%) compared with those with a transplant from a cadaveric or living unrelated donor (URD; 3%; P = 0.062). Although the cumulative graft survival rate was 100% at 5 years for transplants from both LRDs and URDs, the 10-year graft survival rate was only 63% for a graft from an LRD versus 93% for a URD (log-rank test, P = 0.19). A review of other reported series of recurrent transplant IgA nephropathy also showed an apparently greater incidence of GD for a graft from an LRD (28%) compared with a URD (15%). Our data suggest that although recurrent transplant IgA nephropathy is highly prevalent among the Chinese population, the risk for disease recurrence is not particularly increased compared with other ethnic groups. The trend toward a greater risk for GD for living related compared with unrelated allografts in patients with IgA nephropathy needs to be confirmed with further prospective study.
先前关于患有潜在免疫球蛋白A(IgA)肾病患者肾移植的报告表明,移植后IgA肾病的复发率超过50%。IgA肾病最初被视为一种良性疾病,但最近的数据显示,复发性移植IgA肾病可能是导致移植肾失功的一个重要因素。我们在一个单一中心对48例肾移植受者进行了回顾性分析,所有患者均为中国籍,经活检证实IgA肾病是终末期肾衰竭的病因,以确定移植肾中IgA肾病的复发率以及中国患者随后的临床病程。随访的中位时间为52个月(范围为18至155个月)。14例患者(29%)在移植后中位时间52个月(四分位间距为23至82个月)后经活检证实发生复发性移植IgA肾病。复发性移植IgA肾病与更高的血清IgA水平相关(P = 0.01)。移植受者中HLA - A2的存在(P = 0.002)似乎可保护他们在移植肾中不发生复发性IgA肾病。29%的复发性移植IgA肾病患者移植肾功能出现进行性恶化。与来自尸体供体或活体非亲属供体(URD)的移植患者(3%;P = 0.062)相比,来自活体亲属供体(LRD)的移植患者发生进行性移植肾功能障碍(GD)的比例更高(21%)。尽管来自LRD和URD的移植肾5年时的累积移植肾存活率均为100%,但来自LRD的移植肾10年移植肾存活率仅为63%,而来自URD的移植肾为93%(对数秩检验,P = 0.19)。对其他报道的复发性移植IgA肾病系列的回顾也显示,与来自URD(15%)的移植肾相比,来自LRD的移植肾发生GD的发生率明显更高(28%)。我们的数据表明,尽管复发性移植IgA肾病在中国人群中非常普遍,但与其他种族群体相比,疾病复发的风险并未特别增加。IgA肾病患者中,与非亲属同种异体移植相比,亲属活体同种异体移植发生GD风险更高的趋势需要进一步的前瞻性研究来证实。