Zhang H, Inoue T, Tian M, Alyafei S, Oriuchi N, Khan N, Li S, Endo K
Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Gunma University School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan.
Ann Nucl Med. 2001 Jun;15(3):301-6. doi: 10.1007/BF02987851.
The aim of this study was to explore the correlations of detectability and the semi-quantification for hot spot imaging with positron emitters in positron emission tomography (PET) and with a positron coincidence detection system (PCD). Phantom study results for the measurement of the lesion-to-background (L/B) ratio ranged from 2.0 to 30.3, and detectability for hot spot lesion of PET and PCD were performed to correspond to clinical conditions. The detectability and semi-quantitative evaluation of hot spots from 4.4 mm to 36.9 mm in diameter were performed from the PET and PCD images. There were strong correlations between the L/B ratios derived from PET and PCD hot spot images and actual L/B ratios; but the L/B ratio derived from PET was higher than that from PCD with a significant difference of 10% to 54.8%. The detectability of hot spot imaging of PCD was lower than that of PET at 64.8% (PCD) versus 77.8% (PET). Even the actual L/B ratio was 8.0, hot spots more than 10.6 mm in diameter could be clearly identified with PCD imaging. The same identification could be achieved with PET imaging even when the actual L/B ratio was 4.0. This detailed investigation indicated that FDG PCD yielded results comparable to FDG PET on visual analysis and semi-quantitative analysis in detecting hot spots in phantoms, but semi-quantitative analysis of the L/B ratio with FDG PCD was inferior to that with FDG PET and the detectability of PCD in smaller hot spots was significantly poor.
本研究的目的是探讨在正电子发射断层扫描(PET)中使用正电子发射体以及使用正电子符合探测系统(PCD)进行热点成像时,可探测性与半定量之间的相关性。测量病变与背景(L/B)比的体模研究结果范围为2.0至30.3,并且针对PET和PCD的热点病变的可探测性进行了测量,以符合临床情况。从PET和PCD图像对直径4.4毫米至36.9毫米的热点进行了可探测性和半定量评估。PET和PCD热点图像得出的L/B比与实际L/B比之间存在很强的相关性;但PET得出的L/B比高于PCD得出的L/B比,差异显著,为10%至54.8%。PCD热点成像的可探测性低于PET,分别为64.8%(PCD)和77.8%(PET)。即使实际L/B比为8.0,PCD成像也能清晰识别直径超过10.6毫米的热点。当实际L/B比为4.0时,PET成像也能实现同样的识别。这项详细研究表明,在体模中检测热点时,FDG PCD在视觉分析和半定量分析方面产生的结果与FDG PET相当,但FDG PCD对L/B比的半定量分析不如FDG PET,并且PCD对较小热点的可探测性明显较差。