Tjandra J J, Han W R, Ooi B S, Nagesh A, Thorne M
Department of Surgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville and Geelong Hospital, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
ANZ J Surg. 2001 Oct;71(10):598-602. doi: 10.1046/j.1445-2197.2001.02211.x.
Troublesome faecal incontinence following a lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS) is often attributed to faulty surgical techniques: division of excessive amount of internal sphincter or inadvertent injury to the external sphincter. The aim of the present paper was to assess the anatomic and physiological factors that may contribute to faecal incontinence following a technically satisfactory lateral internal sphincterotomy by a group of colorectal specialists.
Fourteen patients (nine women, five men; median age: 38 years; range: 23-52 years) who developed troublesome postoperative faecal incontinence were evaluated by clinical assessment, endoanal ultrasonography and anorectal physiological studies (manometry, pudendal nerve terminal motor latency) by two independent observers. The Cleveland Clinic continence score (0-20; 0, perfect continence; 20, complete incontinence) was used to quantify the severity of faecal incontinence. Fourteen continent subjects after a LIS (nine female patients, five male patients; median age: 36 years; range: 20-44 years) were also evaluated as 'continent' controls (continence score </= 4).
In the incontinent group, the median postoperative Cleveland Clinic continence score was 9 (range: 6-13) compared with a preoperative score of 1 (range: 0-3). On assessment by endoanal ultrasonography the site of the internal sphincterotomy was clearly identified. There were additional coexisting defects, on endoanal ultrasonography, of the external anal sphincter in seven female patients, of the internal sphincter in two female and two male patients; and a defect of both the external and internal sphincters in a male patient who had had a prior fistulotomy. The pudendal nerve terminal motor latency (PNTML) was prolonged in two female patients on the side contralateral to the lateral internal sphincterotomy. In two of five male patients there was no evidence of any occult sphincter injuries. In the continent controls a defect of the distal portion of the external sphincter was noted in one female patient. None of the patients had a prolonged PNTML. The maximum voluntary contraction was significantly lower in the female subjects than in the female continent controls (92 mmHg vs 140 mmHg; P < 0.05), while the resting anal canal pressures and length of the high pressure zone were similar between the study subjects and the continent controls.
Troublesome faecal incontinence after a satisfactorily performed lateral internal sphincterotomy is often associated with coexisting occult sphincter defects.
侧方内括约肌切开术(LIS)后出现令人困扰的大便失禁通常归因于手术技术失误:内括约肌切断过多或意外损伤外括约肌。本文旨在评估一组结直肠专科医生在技术上令人满意的侧方内括约肌切开术后可能导致大便失禁的解剖学和生理学因素。
14例(9例女性,5例男性;中位年龄:38岁;范围:23 - 52岁)术后出现令人困扰的大便失禁的患者,由两名独立观察者通过临床评估、肛门内超声检查和肛肠生理学研究(测压、阴部神经终末运动潜伏期)进行评估。采用克利夫兰诊所失禁评分(0 - 20分;0分表示完全控便;20分表示完全失禁)来量化大便失禁的严重程度。14例LIS术后控便的患者(9例女性患者,5例男性患者;中位年龄:36岁;范围:20 - 44岁)也作为“控便”对照进行评估(失禁评分≤4分)。
在失禁组中,术后克利夫兰诊所失禁评分中位数为9分(范围:6 - 13分),而术前评分为1分(范围:0 - 3分)。通过肛门内超声检查可清晰识别内括约肌切开的部位。在肛门内超声检查中,7例女性患者存在外括约肌的额外并存缺陷,2例女性和2例男性患者存在内括约肌缺陷;1例曾行肛瘘切开术的男性患者同时存在外括约肌和内括约肌缺陷。2例女性患者在侧方内括约肌切开术对侧的阴部神经终末运动潜伏期(PNTML)延长。5例男性患者中有2例未发现任何隐匿性括约肌损伤。在控便对照组中,1例女性患者发现外括约肌远端存在缺陷。所有患者的PNTML均未延长。女性受试者的最大自主收缩明显低于女性控便对照组(92 mmHg对140 mmHg;P < 0.05),而研究对象与控便对照组之间的静息肛管压力和高压区长度相似。
在侧方内括约肌切开术操作满意的情况下,令人困扰的大便失禁通常与并存的隐匿性括约肌缺陷有关。