Rodríguez-Trelles F, Tarrío R, Ayala F J
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-2525, USA.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Sep 25;98(20):11405-10. doi: 10.1073/pnas.201392198. Epub 2001 Sep 11.
The neutrality theory predicts that the rate of neutral molecular evolution is constant over time, and thus that there is a molecular clock for timing evolutionary events. It has been observed that the variance of the rate of evolution is generally larger than expected according to the neutrality theory, which has raised the question of how reliable the molecular clock is or, indeed, whether there is a molecular clock at all. We have carried out an extensive investigation of three proteins, glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GPDH), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and xanthine dehydrogenase (XDH). We have observed that (i) the three proteins evolve erratically through time and across lineages and (ii) the erratic patterns of acceleration and deceleration differ from locus to locus, so that one locus may evolve faster in one than another lineage, whereas the opposite may be the case for another locus. The observations are inconsistent with the predictions made by various subsidiary hypotheses proposed to account for the overdispersion of the molecular clock.
中性理论预测,中性分子进化速率随时间恒定不变,因此存在一个用于确定进化事件时间的分子钟。据观察,进化速率的方差通常比中性理论预期的要大,这就引发了分子钟有多可靠的问题,或者说,究竟是否存在分子钟。我们对三种蛋白质进行了广泛研究,即甘油 - 3 - 磷酸脱氢酶(GPDH)、超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)和黄嘌呤脱氢酶(XDH)。我们观察到:(i)这三种蛋白质在不同时间和不同谱系中进化不稳定;(ii)加速和减速的不稳定模式因基因座而异,所以一个基因座在一个谱系中可能比在另一个谱系中进化得更快,而另一个基因座的情况可能相反。这些观察结果与为解释分子钟过度离散而提出的各种辅助假设所做的预测不一致。